Audit Method: Fraud

Accounting fraud has long been the buzzword in the industry due to its wider and deeper implications on the company, industry and the economy at large. Window dressing is a term used in accounting for presenting financial statements in such a manner that disguise the actual financial transactions and present them in a more favorable way. According to PWC Economic crime survey the five most commonly reported types of economic crimes are asset misappropriation, procurement fraud, bribery and corruption, cybercrime and accounting fraud.

Auditors are required to keep themselves up to date about all these fraudulent practices and should apply professional skepticism while conducting the audit of financial statements.

ISA 240, The Auditor’s Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements addresses all the issues which an auditor has to deal with while conducting the audit. Under ISA-240, auditors are now required to evaluate the effectiveness of an entity’s risk management framework (internal control) in preventing misstatements whether through fraud or otherwise, in all audits. Furthermore, auditors are now required to be more proactive in their search for fraud. The auditor is responsible for maintaining an attitude of professional skepticism throughout the audit, recognizing the possibility that a material misstatement due to fraud could exist, notwithstanding the auditor’s past experience of the honesty and integrity of the entity’s management and those charged with the governance. An overriding requirement of ISA 240 is that auditors are aware of the possibility of there being misstatements due to fraud.

The objectives of the auditor are:

a) To identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements due to fraud;

b) To obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the assessed risks of material misstatement due to fraud, through designing and implementing appropriate responses; and

c) To respond appropriately to fraud or suspected fraud identified during the audit.

The ISA, however, recognize the fact that owing to inherent limitation of an audit, there is an unavoidable risk that some material misstatements of the financial statements may not be detected, even though the audit is properly planned and performed in accordance with the ISAs.

Practice

 Misstatements in the financial statements can arise from either fraud or error. The distinguishing factor between fraud and error is whether the action that results in the misstatement of the financial statements is intentional or unintentional. In planning the audit, auditors must be alert to the possibility of fraud and assess the risk that fraud might occur. The auditor shall treat those assessed risks of material misstatement due to fraud as significant risks and accordingly, the auditor shall obtain an understanding of the entity’s related controls, including control activities, relevant to such risks.