Audit Firm: Regulation of Audit Firms in UK

The Companies Act 2006 of United Kingdom provides powers to bodies known as Recognised Supervisory Bodies (RSBs) to register and supervise auditors. The RSBs are:

• The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland
• Chartered Accountants Ireland
• The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales
• The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants
• The Association of Authorised Public Accountants

The regulatory system of RSBs involves the following:

• Registration processes
• Monitoring
• Investigation and discipline

The RSBs are also subject to independent oversight.  The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has statutory powers delegated to it by Government for the recognition, supervision and de-recognition of the RSBs.  The FRC conducts regular inspection visits to the RSBs to ensure that their responsibilities are being discharged appropriately.  The FRC also has the power to sanction RSBs. In addition to the quality assurance and monitoring undertaken by the RSBs, the Audit Quality Review (AQR) team of the FRC has the responsibility for the monitoring of the audits of all listed and other major public entities. 

The FRC operates an independent disciplinary scheme for accountants and accountancy in the UK. The Accountancy Scheme operates independently of the professional bodies. The FRC deals with cases of potential misconduct which raise or appear to raise important issues affecting the public interest in the UK. All other cases of potential misconduct continue to be dealt with by the professional bodies above.  The FRC Conduct Committee has oversight over the operation of the disciplinary arrangements. The Conduct Committee’s responsibilities in this regard include:

• Operating independent disciplinary Schemes for the investigation of cases which raise or appear to raise important issues affecting the public interest in the UK; and
• Where appropriate, bringing disciplinary proceedings against those whose conduct appears to have fallen short of the standard reasonably to be expected of members or member firms of the relevant professional body.
• Keeping under review the working of the Schemes and the supporting Regulations to ensure that they are operating effectively; and
• Regular publicity for the FRC’s disciplinary activities and achievements as appropriate.

Additional Thoughts

Compliance with local laws and regulations is a matter of utmost care for the audit firms. The audit firms should abide by all the laws and regulations in order to gain the trust of the authorities and the general public.

Reference:      http://goo.gl/1XOfUS

http://goo.gl/7wWT0q

Audit Firm: Changes in the Audit Regulations

Effective financial reporting and auditing is essential for the efficient functioning of capital markets. It supports the development of top quality businesses that attracts investors and also provides the basis for sound commercial decision making along with trust and confidence. Auditing is an essential safety measure to provide independent assurance that the financial reporting of businesses properly reveals their overall condition, and supports the maintenance of the integrity of the business environment.

In UK, the Audit Regulations have been updated with effect from 17 June 2016 to take account of the changes in audit regulation initiated by the European Union Audit Regulation and Directive of 2014. These were transposed into UK law last week by the Statutory Auditors and Third Country Auditors Regulations (SATCAR). The changes apply to various facets of the auditing activity in the shape of eligibility criteria, accounting standards, ethical standards and governance criteria. They also include a restructuring of audit oversight and the enforcement process in the UK, and this restructure has required a number of changes in the audit regulations. The legislation has taken the form of a short new legislation in its own right which recognises the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) as the ultimate competent authority. It also makes a number of amendments to the Companies Act 2006 and Schedule 10 which sets out the role and obligations of the Recognised Supervisory Bodies (RSBs) including ICAEW.

Most firms will observe a very little change in process from the current regime, but in reality the FRC will be exercising a lot more control over the regulatory process. In particular they will be able to apply enforcement sanctions directly without any contact with the RSBs. They can apply these not only to Public Interest Entities (PIE) and AIM auditors but to any audit firm where they have elected to take over the audit inspection and investigation of individual cases.

The powers of the FRC also include the ability to move licences of individual firms between bodies or directly administer them themselves. In such cases the rules of the new RSB can apply to that firm. This requirement is set out in 1.02A.The ARD required some additional sanctioning powers be given to the regulatory bodies, and these have been brought into chapter 6 of the regulations. These include the ability to order repayment of an audit fee in part or whole, and to declare an audit report invalid

Additional Thoughts

Auditing is improving but there is more to do as the future of audit will require a change in thinking from auditors, investors and companies alike.

The complete text of the DIRECTIVE 2014/56/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 16 April 2014 can be found here on this link.

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32014L0056

Reference: http://goo.gl/OeoMF7

Audit Firm: Governance Code

The market for large audits in the UK is dominated by four firms and the risk of the withdrawal of a major firm is a matter of continuing concern to the UK Financial Reporting Council (FRC) and many others. In January 2010 the FRC and Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW) published the Audit Firm Governance Code.

It is applicable to those firms that audit more than 20 listed companies and it is applicable from financial years beginning on or after 1 June 2010. The Code currently applies to seven audit firms that together audit about 95% of the companies listed on the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange. For these firms, the code sets a benchmark for good governance which other audit firms may wish to voluntarily adopt in full or in part. It also codifies much existing good practice and links to matters that audit firms must comply with as regulated professional partnerships.

The seven firms to which the code currently applies are:

• Baker Tilly LLP
• BDO LLP
• Deloitte LLP
• Ernst & Young LLP
• Grant Thornton LLP
• KPMG LLP
• PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

The Code is designed to play four major roles:

• enhance the stature of firms as highly visible exemplars of best practice governance;
• enrich firms’ transparency reports;
• encourage changes in governance which improve the way that firms are run; and
• strengthen the regulatory regime by achieving transparent and effective governance without disproportionate regulation.

The FRC monitors the extent to which these firms comply with the Code. Regular reviews are conducted by FRC to check compliance by firms with all the provisions of the code.

Additional Thoughts

High quality corporate governance is mandatory to foster investment in the economy. Audit firms play the role of watchdogs in the economy and it is essential for them to implement sound governance practices within their own organizations. The Code in this regard will help the audit firms by more sharply defining the public interest, particularly by explicitly recognizing the importance of audit quality.

Audit Firm: Message from Financial Reporting Council to the Big 4

The Financial Reporting Council is the UK’s independent regulator responsible for promoting high quality corporate governance. It recently issued Audit Quality Inspection Report for the year 2014/15.

The review of the firm’s policies and procedures supporting audit quality is undertaken by the Audit Quality Review team of the Financial Reporting Council (“the FRC”) and it covered aspects of the following areas: 

• Tone at the top and internal communications
• Transparency report
• Independence and ethics
• Performance evaluation and other human resource matters
• Audit methodology, training and guidance
• Client risk assessment and acceptance / continuance
• Consultation and review
• Audit quality monitoring
• Other firm-wide matters

 Some of the key messages given by the FRC to the Big 4 audit firms are as follows: 

• Improve the testing of management reports and other system generated information to obtain assurance on its reliability for audit purposes.
• Improve the testing of controls.
• Ensure that audit planning discussions are held with Audit Committees on a more timely basis to enable their input to be reflected appropriately in the audit plan.
• Ensure audit teams pay more attention to the nature and complexity of entities when determining the scope and extent of group and component audit procedures.
• Improve the audit approach in relation to the testing of journals including the selection of journals based on the characteristics of fraud risk
• Ensure that, when using the firm’s valuation and other specialists, audit teams obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to corroborate their conclusions.
• Take action to ensure that partners are notified promptly of new audited entities and dispose of any financial interests held in them on a timely basis.
• Ensure that the firm’s audit reports accurately describe the audit procedures performed to address the identified risks.

Additional Thoughts

The key messages given by the FRC to the audit firms can be used as guidelines by the firms to improve the quality of their audits. Firms should develop more stringent internal quality control review mechanisms to improve audit quality and deliver services to the complete satisfaction of all the stakeholders.