Audit Firm: Recruitment

Are you a recent accounting graduate and want to get hired at any of the big accounting firms? Here are some tips that will prove to be helpful in your search.

Curriculum Vitae: An employer will first meet you on paper through your CV. Prepare a good professional CV that defines your career goal, your education, past experience (if any) and your skills and expertise. CV is a marketing tool for a job seeker and you should use that tool to the greatest effect.

Cover Letter: The purpose of constructing an effective cover letter is to demonstrate your suitability for an organization by identifying how your past academic background and employment make you a top candidate.

Interview: Before going for the interview research the firm and understand the organization and job description. Dress appropriately for the interview, generally this means business professional dress. As it is rightly said that your energy introduces you even before you speak so try to make a good first impression on the interviewer. Ask some intelligent questions during the interview when asked about having any questions from your research conducted earlier on about the company.

Follow up: After the interview send an email to the employer and thanks them for the interview opportunity. This will not only enhance your image as a good communicator but will also ensure that the employer keeps you in the queue for potential selection. 

Some of the key soft skills that employers these days are looking for are:

• Problem solving and analytical thinking
• Initiative and drive
• Team player
• Communication skills (written and verbal)

Some of the key technical skills employers look for in young graduates aspiring to join the auditing profession are:

• Financial accounting and reporting
• Tax strategy, planning and control 
• Risk management and internal control
• IT Skills

Additional Thoughts

Some very useful information can be obtained from the websites of the big Four firms about their recruitment process and policies.

• EY
• PWC
• Deloitte
• KPMG

Audit Firm: Audit Quality Indicators

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) is a nonprofit corporation in USA established by Congress to oversee the audits of public companies in order to protect investors and the public interest by promoting informative, accurate, and independent audit reports. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which created the PCAOB, required that auditors of U.S. public companies be subject to external and independent oversight.

The PCAOB has recently issued a concept release on Audit Quality Indicators (AQI). It has sought the public comment on the content and possible uses of a group of potential "audit quality indicators." The indicators are a potential portfolio of quantitative measures that may provide new insights about how to evaluate the quality of audits and how high quality audits are achieved.

The 28 potential Audit Quality Indicators are:

AUDIT PROFESSIONALS

Availability	Competence	Focus
1. Staffing Leverage 2.Partner Workload 3.Manager and Staff Workload 4.Technical Accounting and Auditing Resources 5.Persons with Specialized Skill and Knowledge	6.Experience of Audit Personnel 7.Industry Expertise of Audit Personnel 8.Turnoverof Audit Personnel 9.Amount of Audit Work Centralized at Service Centers10.Training Hours per Audit Professional	11.Audit Hours and Risk Areas 12.Allocation of Audit Hours to Phases of the Audit

AUDIT PROCESS

Tone at the Top and Leadership	Incentives	Independence	Infrastructure	Monitoring and Remediation
13.Results of Independent Survey of Firm Personnel	14.Quality Ratings and Compensation 15.Audit Fees, Effort, and Client Risk	16.Compliance with Independence Requirement	17.Investment in Infrastructure Supporting Quality Auditing	18.Audit Firms' Internal Quality Review Results 19.PCAOB Inspection Results 20.Technical Competency Testing

AUDIT RESULTS

Financial Statements	Internal Control	Going Concern	Communication between Auditors and Audit Committee	Enforcement and Litigation
21. Frequency and Impact of Financial Statement Restatements for Errors 22.Fraud and other Financial Reporting Misconduct 23.Inferring Audit Quality from Measures of Financial Reporting Quality	24.Timely Reporting of Internal Control Weaknesses	25.Timely Reporting of Going Concern Issues	26.Results of Independent Surveys of Audit Committee Members	27. Trends in PCAOB and SEC Enforcement Proceedings 28.Trends in Private Litigation

Additional Thoughts

Quality control for audit is very important as only with an effective Quality control mechanism, the public interest can be served through independence, integrity, ethics, objectivity and quality performance. The aforementioned quality indicators can prove to be a useful benchmark for auditors to gauge their performance.

Audit Firm: Personality of Auditor

There are a few personal characteristics that are important for an auditor to have:

• Auditors should possess a strong ethical framework and report on issues (or anticipated issues) as they come across them. There is a temptation to "let things go" as further investigation may require more work or reveal embarrassing processes, performance and/or fraud.

• Good communication skills allow auditors to have a rapport with a variety of employees, managers, directors and external parties. As auditors establish good rapport with a variety of individuals, however, they should keep in mind the objectives of the audit (for instance, the reliability, verifiability, accuracy and timeliness of information), as they can often be tempted to not report on issues discovered.

• Strong interpersonal skills are important, due to the variety of informational requests - and often, resistance to those requests - required from a variety of sources. Strong and/or ambitious types may attempt to dissuade auditors from revealing embarrassing findings.

• Auditors need to be team players. As the scope of the audit can be fairly large, it is beneficial to help in other areas of an audit when resource constraints warrant it.

• Finally, "professional skepticism" is an important trait to have, especially when reviewing a company's internal controls. One needs to assess how perpetrators of fraud can beat a company's controls, and auditors need to design and implement a system that can effectively protect the organization's assets.

Audit Firm: Big4 Interview Questions

Here is a list of top 10 interview questions for all the young specialists who wish to join any of the Big four audit firms (in fact any consulting firm) in their future career.

1. Tell me a little about yourself or background?
2. Why KPMG/Deloitte/PwC/E&Y?
3. Why audit/tax/advisory?
4. Are you interviewing with other firms? What’s the response from them?
5. Where do you see yourself in 5 to 10 years?
6. If your friends could pick three words to describe you, what would they be?
7. Do you prefer to travel?
8. What is your biggest weakness/strength?
9. Tell me about a time when you improved a process (or came up with a creative solution)?
10. What do you like best about a career in accounting/auditing?

Audit Firms: Non-Audit Services

Growth in consultancy among the Big Four is outpacing their traditional tax and audit services, while the firms are also outperforming management consultants. Big Four firms have been steadily rebuilding their consultancy arms through a series of acquisitions in order to compensate for stagnating growth for traditional audit work. The type of non-audit services that audit firms provide ranges widely from audit firm to audit firm. They may include professional advice on transactions (for example, a merger, acquisition or restructuring) as well as tax and broader business advisory services (including performance improvement and information technology). Non-audit services may also include advisory work to assist companies to comply with laws and regulations.

The strict regulations imposed by Sarbanes Oxley Act introduced in USA led to a rash of sales of consultancy divisions by the auditing firms. IBM for instance bought PwC's consulting arm, E&Y Consulting had already sold to Cap Gemini and KPMG did an IPO of KPMG Consulting, which then became BearingPoint. But by the time the Big Four's non-compete clauses expired, typically in three to five years, consulting was back as a high-focus area at the accounting firms.

Soon after the Enron controversy died, the accounting firms realized that regulations could be taken care of if they built a practice that largely consisted of non-audit clients where conflict situations didn't arise; and where there was overlap, they could always avoid selling certain services. And that's what they did. Deloitte recorded a revenue figure of US$ 34.2 billion (2014) with growth for consulting at 10.3 percent. EY advisory grew by 14.4% as compared to assurance growth of 4.5% in 2014. Out of PWC total revenue of US$ 34 billion in 2014 18.8 billion was generated by Tax and Advisory Services. Kpmg total advisory revenues for the year 2014 were up by 10.4% to US$9.09 billion, up from 6.5% in FY13.

That's indeed a high turnaround from 2002 when following Enron's bankruptcy and the dissolution of Arthur Andersen, KPMG and PwC dumped their consulting arms; Ernst & Young had already done so in 2000. The sell-off was a reaction to a toughened up Sarbanes-Oxley Act that restricted the scope of non-audit services that could be offered to audit clients to limit any conflict of interest.

Additional Thoughts

In many countries the codes of corporate governance forbids auditors to provide non-audit services to audit clients if that would present a threat to independence for which no adequate safeguards are available. It is the responsibility of the audit committee being the representative of shareholders to oversee the relationship between the auditor and the company. The audit committee must scrutinize the provision of non-audit services by the audit firms and must have to make sure that the independence and objectivity of the audit firm is not compromised.  

Audit Firm: Message from Financial Reporting Council to the Big 4

The Financial Reporting Council is the UK’s independent regulator responsible for promoting high quality corporate governance. It recently issued Audit Quality Inspection Report for the year 2014/15.

The review of the firm’s policies and procedures supporting audit quality is undertaken by the Audit Quality Review team of the Financial Reporting Council (“the FRC”) and it covered aspects of the following areas: 

• Tone at the top and internal communications
• Transparency report
• Independence and ethics
• Performance evaluation and other human resource matters
• Audit methodology, training and guidance
• Client risk assessment and acceptance / continuance
• Consultation and review
• Audit quality monitoring
• Other firm-wide matters

 Some of the key messages given by the FRC to the Big 4 audit firms are as follows: 

• Improve the testing of management reports and other system generated information to obtain assurance on its reliability for audit purposes.
• Improve the testing of controls.
• Ensure that audit planning discussions are held with Audit Committees on a more timely basis to enable their input to be reflected appropriately in the audit plan.
• Ensure audit teams pay more attention to the nature and complexity of entities when determining the scope and extent of group and component audit procedures.
• Improve the audit approach in relation to the testing of journals including the selection of journals based on the characteristics of fraud risk
• Ensure that, when using the firm’s valuation and other specialists, audit teams obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to corroborate their conclusions.
• Take action to ensure that partners are notified promptly of new audited entities and dispose of any financial interests held in them on a timely basis.
• Ensure that the firm’s audit reports accurately describe the audit procedures performed to address the identified risks.

Additional Thoughts

The key messages given by the FRC to the audit firms can be used as guidelines by the firms to improve the quality of their audits. Firms should develop more stringent internal quality control review mechanisms to improve audit quality and deliver services to the complete satisfaction of all the stakeholders. 

Audit firms: Sponsorship Activities

Big accountancy firms have much to gain from sponsorship activities, from supporting charitable causes to developing leadership programmes and promoting sports and arts. Through sponsorship programmes the audit firms not only fulfill their corporate social responsibility by making a positive impact on society and the environment but also maximize value for their business. For the smaller accountancy firms, sponsorship is often more about cultivating business and identity locally. Sponsorships programmes aim to extend positive impact across communities, sports, the arts and business. Audit firms support others to make progress where it matters most whilst offering exciting opportunities for their people and clients to experience who they are in different ways. Firms pursue focused sponsorship partnership strategy where they support a large number of causes aligned with their vision, values and purpose.

Through various sponsorship programmes the Big 4 accountancyfirms spend money all over the world.

EY has been an official partner to the 2012 and the 2014 Ryder Cups. EY also will serve as an official supporter and exclusive provider of professional services in the consulting category for the Rio 2016 Olympic Games. On 15 July 2013, Tate and EY announced a major new three-year arts partnership, making EY one of the largest corporate supporters of Tate.

Deloitte has been a top-tier partner of the Royal Opera House in UK since 2007. British Paralympic Association is the official charity partner of the Deloitte Ride Across Britain event.

PWC sponsor PGA tour event TPC Sawgrass in USA. PWC also supports Irish rugby, Irish Ice Hockey and The America’s Cup.

KPMG's association with the golfers Stacy Lewis and Phil Mickelson reflects shared values.

Additional thoughts

How can the risks be managed?

The key to manage risks in a sponsorship deal is by clearly defining the expectations and objectives of the programme. Choosing the right sponsorship programme and knowing when to end the deal if any controversy erupts can potentially make or break a firm’s reputation. Endorsement insurance can also help protect the sponsor in the event of a scandal or negative publicity. Another method is to sponsor numerous programmes across a range of venues such as sports, arts, culture and charity thus weakening the link between sponsorship and brand.