No, it is not St. Patrick’s Day and we are not going to praise Guiness in this article J
I am currently studying different forms of business organisation and try to apply this knowledge in the field of audit. I was interested by Handy’s concept of shamrock organisation, which is defined in BPP P3 study text as follows:
“The shamrock organisation, or flexible firm, has a core of permanent managers and specialist staff supplied by a contingent workforce of contractors and part-time and temporary workers.”
Thus, in this post I would like to discuss the concept of flexible firms, which might change not only the value chain and network of audit firms, but also the whole audit market.
Problems
Audit businesses face number of problems:
1. Financial crisis – clients less keen on paying for audit and there is the necessity to cut costs;
2. New Legislation – the split of audit and advisory services would lead to problems in staff utilization. Firms might face the issue of overstaffing or understaffing (before it was more leeway to balance advisory and audit projects).
3. Employee expenses – as a result of the two issues above, fixed expenses related with employees become burdensome for audit firms. Fixed salaries, pension schemes and other elements of package expose pressure on profit.
4. Efficiency – are resources invested in junior staff employees show real pay off?
5. Focus – to pick up appropriate people for audit job accounting firms should maintain comprehensive recruitment department, waste time of managers involved in the process, which might seen as waste of resources and shift of focus from delivery of quality services.
I think that flexible firm structure might help to address these problems and change marker
Answer: Concept of Shamrock Organisation
The shamrock concept comprises four so called leaves or elements.
The first leaf is professional core, which consists of professionals defining organization’s core competence. In audit firms it could be employees above manager assistant level or even higher grade staff. They would elaborate methodology, business processes, communicate with clients on major negotiations, review audits and sign up audit reports, establish and implement strategy.
The second element is self-employed professionals and technicians. For audit firms it could be extremely relevant element. IT services might be outsourced and there no need to be reliant on huge army of salary-paid IT specialists; tax, legal, valuation personnel and audit seniors could be hired separately for each audit project. To satisfy demand for these services freelancers as well as specialised firms could be hired.
The third leaf is contingent work force. The hire of this type personnel would totally depend on the external demand for audit firm’s services. I always wandered why audit firms hire people with higher education to do stock counting or cash section audit? Give me a week or two and I will teach secondary school graduates how to audit not only above mentioned sections but also receivables, payables, and even deferred taxes provided that these guys would know that 2x2=4 and more or less have common sense.
Thus, the contingent work force would cover the work of junior level staff, second and third year associates; this might include also the work of senior auditors in some cases (small project; tightly controlled by manager).
The forth element is supposed to be the contribution of consumers. Indeed, unlike other industries there are whole bunch of opportunities for better interaction with client in audit, e.g. audit committee, internal audit departments. I am going to expand this idea further.
Practical Implications
The question is rather simple: how is this model going to work? I would outline following solutions:
· Active markets of freelance professionals;
· Human resources (staffing) firms specialising in recruiting and training staff in certain area. For example, such kind of company might develop diverse skills in secondary school graduates and utilize this employees’ hours efficiently by outsourcing them both to audit, advisory, financial and other firms (e.g. data input/processing centers; call centers). Thus, the contingent work force could be provided by special HR firms;
· Overseas professionals. The new developments in IT and communication allow audit firms to transfer part of work to overseas professionals achieving economy in costs. Tax section and legal contact within audit project could be easily reviewed by specialist in China or India for less fee with the same quality.
· Consumer intervention. The model might provide client with means to influence costs. For example, there are two HR firms (A and B) providing contingent work force for audit services: A has brand name, B is less known but charges lower fees. An audit firm might provide opportunity to client to chose the firm (A or B) to be included into audit budget.
The implementation of shamrock concept might lead to rise of staffing firms specialising on low skilled financial employees. Audit firms would be focused on recruitment experienced high skilled professionals. The necessity in audit seniors (also known as “audit executives” or “assistant managers”) could be liquidated: the managers should be able to undertake some tasks and delegate less complicated issues to temporary workers.
The exchanges (analogy to stock exchanges) of professional and semi-professional labor should become more developed, elaborated and structured. They should provide businesses/audit firms with access to information about freelancer’s previous works, rate per hour, references. There are professional and freelance internet projects (e.g. Odesk or LinkedIn), but they are patchy and not so developed as commodity or stock exchanges.
I would be glad if you share your thoughts on this subject. May be you have some reservations regarding this idea or you might offer the other ways to make audit business more profitable and professional
References
BPP. (2011). Paper P3. Business Analysis. Study Text. London : BPP Learning Media Ltd.
Disclaimer:
"This group is not associated with or approved by ACCA and the views expressed on this page do not necessarily reflect the views of ACCA".
Disclaimer:
"This group is not associated with or approved by ACCA and the views expressed on this page do not necessarily reflect the views of ACCA".