Audit Firm: Impact of Brexit on Audit Firms in UK & Europe

On June 23, 2016, the UK voted to leave the European Union (EU) voluntarily. Amid the highest turnout at a UK-wide vote since 1992, with a 70% turnout rate, the Leave campaign received 52% of the referendum, compared to 48% received by the Remain campaign. The particulars of how the UK will leave the EU will be the subject of negotiations for at least the next two years.

Economists anticipate market and currency instability in the short-term, but the longer term implications will depend heavily on the details of how the UK unravels its participation in the EU. Economists are also anticipating several years of uncertainty, and uncertainty typically does not indicate positive signs for financial markets or economic indicators. Uncertainty among businesses would see a brake applied to investment and deal-making, which would hit one among the most lucrative of areas for accounting practitioners – transactional services market.

From one perspective, for the accountancy sector, the EU is maybe less important as the share of revenue generated by clients in other EU countries is just 4.2%. However, as key major companies and banks might relocate from London to Frankfurt in near future – this will mean a lot less money for accounting firms, but there may be a recovery later.

British relationships with the IASB, which lay outside the EU will remain unchanged. As the UK has always been a keen proponent of IFRS, thus it is unlikely that there would be any retreat to British accounting standards after Brexit. One more area on which accountants are focused are the potential tax implications. Taxation has remained a policy area over which EU member states retain close control. Now after the Brexit vote, EU laws on direct and indirect taxation will cease to apply within the UK, and Britain will regain the right to vary its VAT and excise duty rates beyond the restrictions imposed by EU legislation.

Workload is likely to increase for audit firms due to Brexit but their lucrative value-added services offerings may suffer as a result. Auditors would struggle to provide high-value advice to their clients, instead having to focus on technical questions borne out of the UK leaving the EU.

Additional Thoughts

Nobody can predict with certainty what is going to happen after the Brexit. It is an extraordinary event and determined by many unknown factors. The audit firms should consider what it will look like in the future and should assess their client base. To secure the longevity of the practice, audit firms need to ensure that their client base is well spread. 

References:

http://goo.gl/BV4xGs

http://goo.gl/e85sOH

Auditors’ turn to needle Greece

Greece, Greece, Greece… all types of economists, political analysts, simply dilettantes, and  pseudo specialists are trying to comment on the issue of sovereign debt, Eurozone and the role of Greece in this mess. So I think it is time for us, accountants and auditors to make our pedantic and diligent (as we always do ;) contribution to process of pointing finger at Greece J

I have been recently interested in IFRS adoption in different countries and implications of this rather painful process. There are remarkable research papers dedicated to this topic, among which is study by Siqi Li (2010), who analyses impact of IFRS implementation on the cost of equity capital in Europe. I am going to use his analysis to raise some issues about Greece.

Lots of Requirements and No Enforcement

The author of research took into consideration the fact that effective implementation of IFRS depends on country’s institutional arrangements. In other words, benefits from mandatory IFRS adoption in terms of reduction in the cost of equity are expected to be sensitive to whether the new rules are effectively enforced (Li 2010). So, the scholar compared the European countries using such variables as law enforcement (utilizing studies by La Porta et al. (1998); Leuz et al. (2003)), additional disclosures and inconsistencies in standards. This interesting and appealing analysis was presented in Table 5 of his study, which is attached to this post.

Following observations could be made from this table.

First, the best “mutual friends”, Germany and Greece, are among top 4 countries, which had the greatest number of inconsistencies between local GAAP and IFRS. So here we see that Greece is not alone in it is remoteness from modern accounting practice. If you noticed, Spain is leader in terms of inconsistencies with IFRS.  

Second, considering the number of additional disclosures required per IFRS, Greece as well as Spain remain under our focus as leaders of the list. Germany occupied middle ranks. This shows that financial statements of the Greek and Spanish entities based on local GAAP were less transparent than the other European countries. Even newly accepted Poland and Czech Republic did better job in a convergence process.

Finally, according to the table the worst enforcement ratings belong to Greece, Italy, Spain, and Portugal. Does it remind you something? The problems with sovereign debt and liquidity touched exactly the same list of countries. I wonder if investment analysts use the enforcement ratings as factor to hedge investments of their clients, it would be good thing to do so.

But what can we infer from Greece’s ratings? Having the biggest number of inconsistencies and necessity of additional disclosures under IFRS the country faced huge challenge to enforce accurate financial reporting. On the other hand, low level of legal enforcement and development of institutions impeded this process.

This pattern of reasoning might leads us to the same conclusion regarding Greek tax system. As my Greek acquaintances evidence that the tax and legal system in Greece is overcomplicated and not easy to comply with. Thus, in the situation of low level of law enforcement, the efforts to evade taxes might be rather successful.  As a result this impacts tax collectibility and ability of country to meet its debt service obligations.

Quite another issue is the level of indebtedness of the Greek private businesses, particularly banks. Given the information above, can we rely on their IFRS financial statements and do they reflect actual financial position of businesses?

By the way

Kebab mix

By the way, I do not have anything against Greece or Greek people. In fact, last week I was in Greek restaurant and had fabulous dish of mixed kebab, which comprised of chicken, pork, and lamb meat as well as sheftalia… yummm, delicious! J

References

La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 1998. Law and finance. The Journal of Political Economy 106 (6): 1113–1155.

Leuz, C., D. Nanda, and P. Wysocki. 2003. Earnings management and investor protection: An international comparison. Journal of Financial Economics 69 (3): 505–527.

Li, S. 2010. Does Mandatory Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards in the European Union Reduce the Cost of Equity Capital. The Accounting Review 85 (2):  607-636

Nobes, C., ed. 2001. GAAP 2001: A Survey of National Accounting Rules Benchmarked Against International Accounting Standards by Andersen, BDO, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, Ernst & Young, Grant Thornton, KPMG, PricewaterhouseCoopers. New York, NY: J Wiley & Sons.