Audit Method: Subsequent Events

Subsequent Events as defined in ISA 560 are “Events occurring between the date of the financial statements and the date of the auditor’s report, and facts that become known to the auditor after the date of the auditor’s report.”

The objectives of the auditor for considering subsequent events are:

(a) To obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about whether events occurring between the date of the financial statements and the date of the auditor’s report that require adjustment of, or disclosure in, the financial statements are appropriately reflected in those financial statements in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework; and

(b) To respond appropriately to facts that become known to the auditor after the date of the auditor’s report, that, had they been known to the auditor at that date, may have caused the auditor to amend the auditor’s report.

Perform audit procedures designed to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence that all events up to the date of the audit report that may require adjustment of, or disclosure in, the financial statements have been identified

·   Consider changes in the areas which may affect the financial statements and other information in the annual report such as banking arrangements, currency and interest rates, key markets, key products, customers or vendors, key management or employees, government regulation or policy and the ratio of orders to sales and cash receipts and the position of the order book.

·   Consider other significant knowledge gained, for example press comment, internal audit reports, changes in client trading patterns, changes in laws or regulations, currency devaluations, major fires or catastrophes, or technology failures (e.g. computer operations failures) and security incidents.

·   Evaluate procedures management has established to ensure that subsequent events are identified.

·   Inquire of management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance as to whether any subsequent events have occurred which might affect the financial statements.

·   Review the results of the review of minutes of meetings of the entity’s owners, management and those charged with governance, including audit, executive and other Board committees since the balance sheet date.

·   Consider reviewing invoices from lawyers received after the year-end to determine whether any litigation, claims or assessments exist that were not previously identified in our analysis of legal expenses and other procedures.

·   Review the latest available interim financial statements and, as considered necessary and appropriate, budgets, cash flow forecasts and other related management reports. Consider whether they reveal any adverse trends or significant movements in balance sheet headings compared to the audited financial statements. Consider whether the management information is reliable.

Practice

Where a material subsequent event has been identified, determine whether it is reflected in the financial statements in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework by adequate disclosure and, where appropriate, adjustment of the account balances and transactions affected. Consider also its effect on the audit report.

Audit Firm: ACCA exams

Audit firms are interested to hire and retain qualified accountants. For example, Big4 firms provide support to their employees during their study in college to obtain qualification.  ACCA (The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants) is one of the professional accounting bodies certifying accountants through exams and experience. ACCA exams test the students very rigorously and they are not easy to pass if you are not well prepared ahead of time for it. Here are few tips about approaching the ACCA exams that will prove to be helpful in your preparations and to get you pass these exams.

Familiarity with Syllabus

Get yourself familiar with the syllabus of ACCA certification. ACCA has two levels; one is the Fundamental level that includes 9 papers from F1 to F9. And the other Level is called Professional level that include a total of 7 papers from P1 to P7 but you will be given a choice to attempt any two papers among P4 to P7. Choose among the papers from P4 to P7 wisely as you may get stuck in one or two papers in the end and it can waste your exam attempts, time and money.

Learning material

Choosing your books from which to study for the exams is a very major step as it can determine your success or failure from the start. ACCA's new Approved Content Providers are:

• Becker Professional Education
• BPP Learning Media
• Kaplan Publishing

Exam Paper Analysis

After when you have finished your course well at least once you are ready to take a look at the exam papers. Analyzing exam papers for trends is very important as it can give you clues about which topics to give more weightage and which topics demand less preparation. Try to attempt the full paper in actual time bounded exam pressure simulated scenario. This will give you a very good idea of where you are lacking. Do you need to concentrate more on few topics or you need to grasp the important topics well so as to finish the paper in time.

On Exam day

Sleep well before exam day is a cliché we hear from our seniors and teachers. This is actually very important for your performance on exam day. If you will feel relax you will perform and deliver in a much better way. ACCA exams have 15 minutes reading time for reading the question paper. Use this time efficiently. Plan the first question you have to answer when the reading time is over. Also you can arrange the questions in the in the order of difficulty during that time. Attempt the easy questions first and then go for the difficult ones. When answering questions, understand the requirements of the question and write only to the point answers. Remember DO NOT leave any question unanswered of you have time remaining. There is no negative marking in these exams and writing one or two important concepts well, even if you don’t know the complete answer will secure you the minimum marks that will help you to cross the minimum passing threshold for the whole paper.

After the exam

Try avoid discussing the paper if you are going to attempt another paper in a day or two as all you have in your hands now is to get ready for the next paper and try not to repeat the mistakes which you have committed in today’s paper.

In the end I would share this beautiful quote with you.

The reason why most people face the future with apprehension instead of anticipation is because they don't have it well designed." -- Jim Rohn.

Sources:

• http://www.accaglobal.com/gb/en/discover/about.html
• http://www.accaglobal.com/ca/en/student/your-study-options/alp-content.html
• http://www.accaglobal.com/us/en/student/exam-support-resources.html

Disclaimer:
"This group is not associated with or approved by ACCA and the views expressed on this page do not necessarily reflect the views of ACCA".

Audit Exam Ultimate Pass Key

Last summer I successfully passed ACCA exam, P7 “Advanced Audit & Assurance”. While preparing for the exam, I designed succinct and universal “question tackling plan”, which helped to structure my ideas on auditing. In this post I would like to share my knowledge just before coming ACCA examination session.  

I believe it would be useful for all exams related with financial audit. So the candidates for qualifications like CPA or ICAEW are welcomed to utilize it as well. J

The logic is simple: the plan consists of common subjects/questions and points suggested to be addressed.

Question Tackling Plan

1.      Ethics area question

1.1.   Technical competence;

1.2.Objectivity/Independence (possible threats: self-review, familiarity, intimidation, self-interest, advocacy)

1.3.   Professional behavior;

1.4.   Integrity;

1.5.   Confidentiality.

Mnemonic: TOPIC

2.      Professional (audit business) area question

2.1.   Competence;

2.2.   Resources/costs;

2.3.   Reputation;

2.4.   Staff quality;

2.5.   Quality control: Acceptance; Directorship; Supervision; Review; Consulting; Disputes.

3.      Audit Opinion related question

3.1.   Clarity;

3.2.   Details (standards, amounts, scope);

3.3.   Structure (is heading on the right place?) of opinion and its Consistency (starts like “except for” and finishes like adverse opinion);

3.4.   Types of appropriate opinions. This depends on evidences (sufficient, mistake material and pervasive?);

3.5.   Prior year opinion.

4.      Audit Matters (audit evidence/process) question

4.1.   Materiality;

4.2.   Standard breached (IFRS, recognition, valuation criteria etc.);

4.3.   Risks of misstatement;

4.4.   Impact on Audit Opinion;

4.5.   Reliability (source of evidence).

5.      Audit Evidence question

Mnemonics:

Sources of evidence -  DADA3: Document Asset Director (interview/representations) Accounting record 3rd Party

Procedures AE IOU: Analytical (plausibility/predictability)   Enquiry & Confirm (written/verbal)     Inspection (documents/assets)       Observation (assets, process) RecalcUlation (opening balance check)

Elements of evidence:

5.1.   General: budgets/plans, accounting policy;

5.2.   Calculations: rates, models, risks, probabilities, impairment reviews, useful lives, assumptions reasonableness explanation;

5.3.   Disclosure: draft notes;

5.4.   Documents types:

5.4.1.      Bank statements, invoice, bill, dispatch/delivery note;

5.4.2.      Contract, agreement, insurance policy, title deed;

5.4.3.      Claim litigation copy, insurance claim;

5.4.4.      Log books, time-sheets;

5.4.5.      Minutes, orders, policies;

5.4.6.      Correspondence, letters;

5.4.7.      Tax returns;

5.5.   Reconciliations (with tax authority, debtor), confirmations;

5.6.   Record of discussion, interview, talk with employees;

5.7.   Valuation reports, surveys;

5.8.   Breakdowns (check for misclassification), samples.

Golden Rule:

Your answer should be always close to the question scenario: (1) the answer should be relevant; (2) the question text contains hint for answer.

You are welcomed to share your tips for audit exams. Good Luck! J

          Disclaimer:
"This group is not associated with or approved by ACCA and the views expressed on this page do not necessarily reflect the views of ACCA".

Audit Procedures: Subsequent Events

The subject of subsequent events is always relevant both for accounting students and professionals. The risk is quite high due to broad definition of “adjusting event” category in IAS 10:

     “An event after the reporting period that provides further evidence of conditions that existed at the end of the reporting period, including an event that indicates that the going concern assumption in relation to the whole or part of the enterprise is not appropriate.”

The assessor of ACCA F8 paper, Steve Collings, wrote good article on this issue and I am going to highlight some moments and give examples in this post

Going Concern – No Conditions

Insolvent?
Going Concern issue!

As could be noticed from definition IFRS requires that some conditions should preexist for event to be adjusting. For the purpose of provision accruals IAS 37 specifies those conditions:

• Reliable estimation of obligation;
•  Obligation (conditions) whether constructive or legal existed at year end;
• Transfers of money are expected with regards to this event.

For example, the CEO of well-known oil company gave a promise to clean any mess caused by his company on the 31^st of December. The oil spill happened on 5^th of January and as a result all expenditures required to clean the oil should be undertaken by company no matter if there is any special legislation.

Quite another situation with going concern issue. No special conditions required to acknowledge that company is not going concern anymore. The roots of this in concept of IFRS which assumes that observation of standards gives true and fair results only if company is going concern.

Examples

In my practice I had some issues related with subsequent events. For example, warehouse full of food (inventory) was burned. The issue was that it happened someday around the year end, it happened near the Siberian forest so it was difficult to access the warehouse. Finally, after thorough investigation it was found out that it happened after the year end, the matter was material so I had to disclose this issue in the notes to inventory section.

The other issue was as follows. My client has signed the management representation letter where he confirmed that he had disclosed all information, including environmental matters. Meanwhile, after a week the representation letter was signed but before the audit report signature it got known that local authorities started the investigation regarding recent air pollution committed by company. Eventually, the pollution had immaterial implications, but there are several lessons to be learned from that. First, the management representation letter should be signed the date closest to audit report, but bear in mind that this could become an issue incase of multilocation audit. It requires additional coordination efforts to make management of subsidiary sign the representation letter the date nearest to the date of audit report. Second, the procedures requiring review of outside information (newspapers, journals, databases) about the client should not be ignored, to be done thoroughly and client should be questioned in case of material issues. Third, even if the news/management answers evidently show that conditions did not exist at the year end, there is still necessity to check reason of pollution (in my example), whether there was a concealment with management involvement.

Timeline

I provide you with timeline of dates relevant for auditor in detection of events affecting audit procedures and actions to be undertaken in accordance with ISA 560. 

Audit Sample: Simulating Scientific Approach

The sampling approach in audit is practical embodiment of “reasonable assurance” concept. Steve Collings, the assessor of F8 ACCA paper, has written article, where briefly explained the main principles of sampling in audit context. In this post I would like to discuss some issues regarding sampling phenomena.

A Little Bit of Theory

Based on the distinctive characteristics of statistical sampling (random selection and use of probability theory) following classification of sampling methods can be inferred from the ISA 530:

1.      Statistical sampling:

1.1.   Random sampling;

1.2.   Systematic sampling;

1.3.   Monetary unit sampling.

2.      Non-statistical sampling:

2.1.   Haphazard sampling;

2.2.   Block selection.

Actually, there are two steps in sampling process: determining the number of items you need to select from general population, and, aftermath select those items appropriately to make sample representative. By “representative” I mean that sampled population has to possess all qualities pertained to general population. 

History

Power in his book “Audit Society: Rituals of Verification” provides some insights on the sampling application in early years of audit. Block-tests – the form of proto-sampling – was used in late XIX century to test relevant transactions within particular month. However, the scholar notes that such method “lacked statistically precise notions of representativeness”.

Normal probability distribution 

Power states that American audit was pioneer in application statistically reasoned sampling methods. The process of formalisation and development of statistical methodology in audit began in 1930s-1940s. The drivers of these methods application were pragmatism and economic focus of US firms.

So at the moment we (auditors) have to be grateful to mathematical statistics and more specifically to probability theory. Obviously, now unlike before our pursuit to be more efficient and profitable backed up scientific or semi-scientific methods and strengthened by audit standards and legislation.

Practical Perspectives

However, working in audit firm you do not have to be a mathematician to apply variety of samples. Nowadays in most cases audit firms use sampling software. To be successful in running sample process following items need to be entered into program:

·      Risk level, which is usually significant, moderate or low;

·      Number of items in general population;

·      Total value of general population;

·      Total value and number of key material items, which need to pre-selected for separate testing in addition to test of sampled items.

Risk level is essential for determining right number of items in sample, the mistake could result overaudit or wrong audit opinion.

We should not forget about the judgment in audit profession. Of course, the process of calculation the number of sampled items is rather formalised, but judgment could be used in setting up initial risk per flow of transactions, establishing key material items, utilising selection process (e.g. systematic vs. haphazard). If the judgment is used it would be necessary to document appropriately the reason and factors prompting it. This is especially relevant in cases when the judgmental approach substantially differs from what is reasonably expected in similar circumstances.