Showing posts with label internal control system. Show all posts
Showing posts with label internal control system. Show all posts

Friday, July 22, 2016

Audit Method: Internal Control Component: Information Systems

The ISA 315, has divided the entity’s internal control process in to five components. One among these components is the Information Systems. According to ISA 315, while conducting the audit of financial statements, the auditor needs to obtain an understanding of the information system, including the related business processes, relevant to financial reporting, including the following areas:

·         The classes of transactions in the entity’s operations that are significant to the financial statements;
·         The procedures, within both information technology and manual systems, by which those transactions are initiated, recorded, processed, corrected as necessary, transferred to the general ledger and reported in the financial statements;
·         The related accounting records, supporting information and specific accounts in the financial statements that are used to initiate, record, process and report transactions;
·         How the information system captures events and conditions, other than transactions, that are significant to the financial statements;
·         The financial reporting process used to prepare the entity’s financial statements, including significant accounting estimates and disclosures; and
·         Controls surrounding journal entries, including non-standard journal entries used to record non-recurring, unusual transactions or adjustments.

The information system relevant to financial reporting objectives, which includes the accounting system, consists of the procedures and records designed and established to:

·         Initiate, record, process, and report entity transactions (as well as events and conditions) and to maintain accountability for the related assets, liabilities, and equity;
·         Resolve incorrect processing of transactions, for example, automated suspense files and procedures followed to clear suspense items out on a timely basis;
·         Process and account for system overrides or bypasses to controls;
·         Transfer information from transaction processing systems to the general ledger;
·         Capture information relevant to financial reporting for events and conditions other than transactions, such as the depreciation and amortization of assets and changes in the recoverability of accounts receivables; and
·         Ensure information required to be disclosed by the applicable financial reporting framework is accumulated, recorded, processed, summarized and appropriately reported in the financial statements.


Practice


Significant and rapid changes in information systems can change the risk relating to internal control. The extent and nature of the risks to internal control vary depending on the nature and characteristics of the entity’s information system. The entity should respond to the risks arising from the use of IT in internal control by establishing effective controls in light of the characteristics of the entity’s information system.

Tuesday, June 28, 2016

Audit News Briefing: 28 June 2016

Audit-is-cool is pleased to accumulate and provide its readers with the news on audit and related topics:

June 27, 2016
AccountingWeb.com
Internal Controls Over Information Technology at Your Firm
American Institute of CPA awardee for Information Management & Technology Assurance, Sundeep Bablani wrote: “… enhancements in technology have significantly changed the outlook of evaluating controls from an auditor’s perspective.” This is about organizations’ reliance on manual controls in identifying unusual transactions. He explained the ‘integrated audit technique’ and emphasized on the necessity to conduct frequent IT audit evaluations in view of constant change in technology.

“Controls over technology have a direct impact on the overall reliability of financial statements regardless of the size of the organization. Financial auditors are therefore required to obtain a general understanding of information technology (IT) controls as part of their audits.”

June 24, 2016
AccountingToday.com
Will the Brexit Break E.U. Audit Firm Rotation?
Editor-in-chief Michael Cohn explained the impact of timing – when U.K. voted to “Brexit” from the E.U. only a week before the effectivity of the new rules for mandatory audit firm rotation.

His opinion states: “It’s probably too soon to say for sure. The mandatory audit firm provisions are only part of a wide-ranging set of audit market reforms now mandated in the E.U. They aim to force large public companies to tender requests for new audit firms at least every 10 years and to actually rotate audit firms at least every 20 years.”

He also disclosed a recent statistical finding by Ernst & Young that – One out of five large companies in the United Kingdom is “woefully unprepared” for the new EU rules on audit firm rotation.

June 14, 2016
Economia.ICAEW.com
Big Four will take in each other's dirty washing under new audit law, says Lord Hodgson
Pointing out concerns regarding the effect of the new regulation – The Statutory Auditors and Third Country Auditors Regulations 2016 (effective 17 June 2016), Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbots lobby for joint auditing: “The challenge to the government and the profession is: how do you achieve break-in to the magic circle? One way would be to encourage joint auditing.”

He raised lack of competition in the audit market – an issue that the new regulation failed to resolve: “These regulations are the produce of tired thinking. It is a shame that the profession and its regulators have not been able to think more creatively about the real issues and, instead, have fallen back on the old policy of, ‘If in doubt, stick in another regulation’.”

June 8, 2016
The Wall Street Journal

WSJ: Top 10 Audit Firms Now Audit 61% of SEC Registrants
Based on the recent data released by the Audit Analytics research provider, CFO Journal’s Senior Editor Maxwell Murphy marked the observation that audit work is now concentrated among fewer accounting firms. The reason – top 10 U.S. accounting firms have stepped up the share of corporate books they oversee.

·         3.8% increase from 2015 – top firms audit 60.7% of nearly 7,000 firms and funds under SEC audit regulation.
·         Global Six audit 96.8% of large multinational accounts of companies categorized as “accelerated filers”. The Big Four handle almost 91% of these audit work.
·         Global six also captured 2/3 or more of smaller accelerated filers and non-accelerated filers.