Audit Firm: US PCAOB regulation of US Audit Firms

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) is a private-sector, nonprofit corporation established by the U.S. Congress to oversee the audits of public companies in United States in order to protect investors and the public interest by promoting informative, accurate, and independent audit reports. In U.S in early 2000, when the Enron and WorldCom Scandal came to surface, the congress felt the need for more strict regulations for the audit firms and thus promulgated the Sarbanes Oxley Act on July 30, 2002. This act mandated the formation of PCAOB to oversee the audit of public companies that are subject to the securities laws, in order to protect the interests of investors and further the public interest in the preparation of informative, accurate, and independent audit reports for companies the securities of which are sold to, and held by public investors.

Before the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the audit profession was self-regulated in U.S., but after its promulgation, it required that auditors of U.S. public companies be subject to external and independent oversight for the first time in history. In passing this Act, Congress sought to restore investor confidence and address serious gaps in the U.S. regulatory framework that were identified through the financial scandals of 2001-2002. The PCAOB comprises of five members, including the Chairman and are appointed to staggered five-year terms by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

The PCAOB has five primary responsibilities:

·         Registration of public accounting firms (including non-US firms) that audit public companies (including non-US issuers) trading in US securities markets;

·         Inspections of registered public accounting firms;

·         Establishment of auditing and related attestation, quality control, ethics, and independence standards for registered public accounting firms; and

·         Investigation and discipline of registered public accounting firms and their associated persons for violations of specified laws or professional standards.

·         Enforcing compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

Additional Thoughts

Although the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, through establishment of PCAOB, introduced much strict regulations for the audit profession, but the WorldCom and Enron scandal alongwith the dissolution of the then big five firm Arthur Andersen which was found guilty of fudging Enron accounts, brought a great disrepute for the profession. Audit firms need to develop a sense of self-regulation and high ethical standards so that the investors and public in general endow trust upon the profession.

Reference: https://goo.gl/YU1dgc

                  https://goo.gl/mpKGaX

Audit Firm: Audit Quality Indicators

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) is a nonprofit corporation in USA established by Congress to oversee the audits of public companies in order to protect investors and the public interest by promoting informative, accurate, and independent audit reports. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which created the PCAOB, required that auditors of U.S. public companies be subject to external and independent oversight.

The PCAOB has recently issued a concept release on Audit Quality Indicators (AQI). It has sought the public comment on the content and possible uses of a group of potential "audit quality indicators." The indicators are a potential portfolio of quantitative measures that may provide new insights about how to evaluate the quality of audits and how high quality audits are achieved.

The 28 potential Audit Quality Indicators are:

AUDIT PROFESSIONALS

Availability	Competence	Focus
1. Staffing Leverage 2.Partner Workload 3.Manager and Staff Workload 4.Technical Accounting and Auditing Resources 5.Persons with Specialized Skill and Knowledge	6.Experience of Audit Personnel 7.Industry Expertise of Audit Personnel 8.Turnoverof Audit Personnel 9.Amount of Audit Work Centralized at Service Centers10.Training Hours per Audit Professional	11.Audit Hours and Risk Areas 12.Allocation of Audit Hours to Phases of the Audit

AUDIT PROCESS

Tone at the Top and Leadership	Incentives	Independence	Infrastructure	Monitoring and Remediation
13.Results of Independent Survey of Firm Personnel	14.Quality Ratings and Compensation 15.Audit Fees, Effort, and Client Risk	16.Compliance with Independence Requirement	17.Investment in Infrastructure Supporting Quality Auditing	18.Audit Firms' Internal Quality Review Results 19.PCAOB Inspection Results 20.Technical Competency Testing

AUDIT RESULTS

Financial Statements	Internal Control	Going Concern	Communication between Auditors and Audit Committee	Enforcement and Litigation
21. Frequency and Impact of Financial Statement Restatements for Errors 22.Fraud and other Financial Reporting Misconduct 23.Inferring Audit Quality from Measures of Financial Reporting Quality	24.Timely Reporting of Internal Control Weaknesses	25.Timely Reporting of Going Concern Issues	26.Results of Independent Surveys of Audit Committee Members	27. Trends in PCAOB and SEC Enforcement Proceedings 28.Trends in Private Litigation

Additional Thoughts

Quality control for audit is very important as only with an effective Quality control mechanism, the public interest can be served through independence, integrity, ethics, objectivity and quality performance. The aforementioned quality indicators can prove to be a useful benchmark for auditors to gauge their performance.