Week-end: Big4 Audit Career Commercials

How would you assess the creativity of accounting firms? This question is especially relevant in the field of attracting young specialists as new hires.In this post I've decided to pick up career commercials addressed to graduates and potential junior employees made by industry leaders, Big4.

Why Deloitte? I think Deloitte's ad was rather dynamic, with good music, but a bit of trivial.



Why EY? EY has actually disappointed me, I found nothing creative which would look like this remarkable video. Finally, I picked up this video with interview of a nice girl with interesting accent J



Why KPMG? I decided to take KPMG Singapore's ad. The background music really touched me, it's style differs from music which other accounting firms place in their ads. Meanwhile, image could have been more clear.



Why PwC? In my opinion, there was not anything interesting among new PwC's commercials. So I end up selecting relatively old commercial: it might be viewed as pompous and pretentious one, but sometimes I find such kind of creativity rather appealing. I do not know why, but it has reminded me Ayn Rand's "Atlas Shrugged".



What commercials related with graduates hiring do you find interesting? Are there any appealing ones or real masterpieces? Please share information in comments.

Audit Exam Ultimate Pass Key

Last summer I successfully passed ACCA exam, P7 “Advanced Audit & Assurance”. While preparing for the exam, I designed succinct and universal “question tackling plan”, which helped to structure my ideas on auditing. In this post I would like to share my knowledge just before coming ACCA examination session.  

I believe it would be useful for all exams related with financial audit. So the candidates for qualifications like CPA or ICAEW are welcomed to utilize it as well. J

The logic is simple: the plan consists of common subjects/questions and points suggested to be addressed.

Question Tackling Plan

1.      Ethics area question

1.1.   Technical competence;

1.2.Objectivity/Independence (possible threats: self-review, familiarity, intimidation, self-interest, advocacy)

1.3.   Professional behavior;

1.4.   Integrity;

1.5.   Confidentiality.

Mnemonic: TOPIC

2.      Professional (audit business) area question

2.1.   Competence;

2.2.   Resources/costs;

2.3.   Reputation;

2.4.   Staff quality;

2.5.   Quality control: Acceptance; Directorship; Supervision; Review; Consulting; Disputes.

3.      Audit Opinion related question

3.1.   Clarity;

3.2.   Details (standards, amounts, scope);

3.3.   Structure (is heading on the right place?) of opinion and its Consistency (starts like “except for” and finishes like adverse opinion);

3.4.   Types of appropriate opinions. This depends on evidences (sufficient, mistake material and pervasive?);

3.5.   Prior year opinion.

4.      Audit Matters (audit evidence/process) question

4.1.   Materiality;

4.2.   Standard breached (IFRS, recognition, valuation criteria etc.);

4.3.   Risks of misstatement;

4.4.   Impact on Audit Opinion;

4.5.   Reliability (source of evidence).

5.      Audit Evidence question

Mnemonics:

Sources of evidence -  DADA3: Document Asset Director (interview/representations) Accounting record 3rd Party

Procedures AE IOU: Analytical (plausibility/predictability)   Enquiry & Confirm (written/verbal)     Inspection (documents/assets)       Observation (assets, process) RecalcUlation (opening balance check)

Elements of evidence:

5.1.   General: budgets/plans, accounting policy;

5.2.   Calculations: rates, models, risks, probabilities, impairment reviews, useful lives, assumptions reasonableness explanation;

5.3.   Disclosure: draft notes;

5.4.   Documents types:

5.4.1.      Bank statements, invoice, bill, dispatch/delivery note;

5.4.2.      Contract, agreement, insurance policy, title deed;

5.4.3.      Claim litigation copy, insurance claim;

5.4.4.      Log books, time-sheets;

5.4.5.      Minutes, orders, policies;

5.4.6.      Correspondence, letters;

5.4.7.      Tax returns;

5.5.   Reconciliations (with tax authority, debtor), confirmations;

5.6.   Record of discussion, interview, talk with employees;

5.7.   Valuation reports, surveys;

5.8.   Breakdowns (check for misclassification), samples.

Golden Rule:

Your answer should be always close to the question scenario: (1) the answer should be relevant; (2) the question text contains hint for answer.

You are welcomed to share your tips for audit exams. Good Luck! J

          Disclaimer:
"This group is not associated with or approved by ACCA and the views expressed on this page do not necessarily reflect the views of ACCA".

The Role of Big4 in promoting IFRS

The audit of IFRS reports is one of the major services provided by the international accounting networks. This is because they possess necessary knowledge and skills, which could be used all over the world. However, there are negative moments in this process, which could be illustrated by conclusion made by Sucher and Alexander (2002) in their research:

     “Given their power over both the production and audit of IAS accounts, the Big Five firms play a very large role in interpreting and implementing IAS standards in a particular country.  This raises issues of power and responsibility with respect to compliance with IAS that need to be addressed clearly by the IASB”

So this post is going to address this issue and point out on existing problem especially in emerging markets.

Illustrations

The issue was substantially researched by Sucher and Alexander (2002) based on the example of Russia and by Sucher and Jindrichovska (2004) in study of situation in Czech Republic.

The problem is that companies in emerging economies suffer from lack of knowledge and expertise in preparation of IFRS accounts. The probable solution could be to hire IFRS specialist or to outsource reporting process. But on the one hand there is a shortage of qualified and experienced professionals in emerging markets. On the other hand, outsourcing by one and afterwards auditing by another independent firm are seen as superfluous costs. Finally, these companies opt into simple solution – they ask audit firms both to prepare and audit their IFRS accounts. This state of things as honourable auditors we can’t tolerate, can we?

Sucher and Alexander (2002) illustrated the situation by remark of one of Big Five (at the moment of research) interviewees:

“As you know we do not prepare accounts for our clients – it is an independence issue….however, we do provide a degree of assistance….. Some accountants in enterprises crunch the numbers (for IAS) and others say, ‘look guys we pay you to do it.  It is a fairy tale’”

It is not only willingness to save money, the issue is also related with the perception of an audit as no-value-adding activity. Interviewees in Czech Republic complained that the earlier Big 4 audit firm provided such package of services while the latest Big 4 auditors refuse to do this (Sucher and Jindrichovska 2004). One of the Big 4 auditors (interviewee) added fuel to the fire:

“Some financial managers and accountants [in enterprises] do not know what is going on [with IFRS]. They are only the passive receivers. In [X audit firm], there are templates that transform Czech accounting to IAS. The knowledge is kept in the audit company. It is big business [for the audit firm]. You can train companies to do the supporting sheets hut the final bit is done by the audit firm.”(Sucher and Jindrichovska 2004).

Meanwhile, management of the companies would always be keen on saving costs on such things like audit. It is quite likely that such kind of cosy relations are more beneficial to audit firms. At least they could have separated audit and accounting team, but according to research it would be too costly for audit firms and they end up by assigning one team of people to do both jobs, which is a shame.

Problems

The basic issue which arises here is how far should we trust financial statements prepared in emerging markets? To what extent this practice spread in other emerging countries, where corporate governance and law enforcement are not developed enough? I think that it is highly probable that similar “reporting-auditng” is practiced in China, where local management is rather pushy in accounting issues (see Deloitte’s case).

The other question how can we deal with the issue in sensible way. For example, one is audit manager and one is doing audit of IFRS reports of Brazilian company. The resourceful Brazilian finance director provides auditor with financial statements (FS) essentially based on Brazilian GAAP, but with name of IFRS on its face. The trick is that you will do honest auditing, spot discrepancies from real IFRS and provide list of adjustments which need to be done J It is foxy tactic, isn’t it?

What do you think about truthfulness of IFRS accounts of companies from emerging markets listed on global stock exchanges? Have you faced approach mentioned above in your reporting or auditing practice? How to discourage auditors from doing that especially in the context of coming “pure-audit-firms” legislation? Please share your knowledge and experience.

References

Sucher, P. and Alexander, D. (2002) IAS: Issues of Country, Sector and Audit Firm Compliance in Emerging Economies (London: Centre for Business Performance of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales).

Sucher P., and Jindrichovska I. (2004) Implementing IFRS: A Case Study of the Czech Republic. EAA, Accounting in Europe, Vol. 1, pp. 109-141.

Audit Procedures: Final Stage

The incentive for writing this post was recent article by Lisa Weaver, ACCA Advanced Audit examiner, on the topic of audit completion. Following essential subjects were covered there:

1)  Review of audit files and evaluation of misstatements (ISA 220, ISA 230, ISA 450);

2)      Final analytical procedures (ISA 520);

3)      Subsequent events and going concern procedures (ISA 560);

4)  Written representation and communication with those charged with governance (ISA 580, ISA 260);

5)      Audit clearance meeting.

The issue of subsequent events and going concern auditing I have already covered in one ofmy previous articles. In this post I would like to consider analytical procedures and meetings with client.

Being analyst

The task of performing analytical procedures in respect of financial statements usually called overall analytical review (OAR). It enables to examine client’s financials in terms of common sense and ensure that test of details were relevant. In addition, for audit senior or manager it is great opportunity to show broadness of mind and deepness of understanding of client. Of course, the quality of work done would influence his/her performance assessment.

Example of Gross Margin Analysis

The major problem, which auditors face in performing OAR is lack of time. This is because at the end of audit project everybody expects deliverables from you, there are lots of work need to be done. So it is necessary to organise audit process in a way that it would save time in future.

One possible solution is to delegate part of work to junior staff while they are doing audit of separate accounting sections. For example, after performing principal audit procedures junior auditor would be responsible to make reasonable analysis from the business point of view. Why inventory item in trial balance increased so dramatically this year? So by the time of doing OAR senior auditor will have preliminary analysis of item in balance sheet, which could be expanded or left as it is if explanation provided is comprehensive and sensible.

Inventory structure analysis

I would also like to emphasise necessity of using understanding of general business tendencies and economic factors while doing OAR. For example, I had following case. The inventory of client increased and accountant explained vaguely that it is due to prices leap. To address this explanation I have undertaken following steps:

1)    Found out what kind of inventory caused increase: it was special alloyed construction steel;

2)  Found out that sales and percentage of this kind of steel in total inventory also increased;

3)   Found out from external sources (steel producers magazines, special business overviews) and internal sources (invoices, contract specifications) that special alloyed construction steel is rather expensive type of metal;

4)   Found out that due to increase of demand on construction steel in China (it was before 2008) price on all types construction steel and its components (e.g., chemical additives) had increased.

So the shift to production of more expensive special alloy steel was driven by market and fit into general economic tendencies, i.e. there was nothing controversial in client’s explanations of increase in inventory value.

I like analytical procedures, because it is creative and intellectual task: it allows you to compare facts from different sources, and find out if client explanations are coherent and persuasive enough.

Being diplomat       

At the end of audit it is necessary to discuss major issues occurred during audit process and their implications. Generally, there are no problems in carrying out this meeting. However, there are some issues arising in case of multilocation audit. Management of subsidiary is usually rather nervous about audit outcomes and sometimes there is a substantial lag between the moment of fieldwork end and issuing of audit opinion. So to my opinion if auditors want to maintain good relations with local management it would be good to communicate some preliminary (flexible) deadlines of finalising work or find words which make client employees understand further steps and ensure your future effective cooperation.

If you have any interesting examples of your experience finalising audit please comment and give some tips.