Saturday, August 9, 2014

Group and Statutory Audit tailoring


Hi there! Today we are going to talk about combination of two audits (let them be G&S in this blog post): a group and statutory audit. It’s not uncommon to perform them one after in another.

Both auditors and clients want to use synergy of two audits. The value for clients to be serviced by one firm for G&S is saved company’s time/efforts spent for audit and decreased combined price. An  auditor wins by decreasing costs of doing audit and improving realisation rates. However these benefits could be jeopardised by incorrect selection of approach to materiality and scope. There is a necessity to align and methodologically tailor both type of audits. There are number of issues which might differ and impact our samples and scope: materiality, risks (as well as new risks might appear by the time statutory audit starts or whichever is going to be the second), and accounts in scope.

The problem I see here is time lag between these assignments. Sometimes it’s unclear what surprises might appear in statutory accounts after G audit. Primary team instructions and activity also play a big role here.

As in case of multilocation audits I think that methodology should be developed for the purposes of combined (G&S) audit as well.

Restart

  The blog is about to restart.




Wednesday, February 22, 2012

The Results of Blog Polls


This post reports on the results of polls carried out in my blog from 18th of January to 15th of February 2012. The polls closed automatically on 15th of February and have been seen for all readers of my blog on the right hand side of blog interface.
The rules of polls were published in separate post (see link). Total number of votes (voters) amounted 48 with the option to select three subjects. However, some voters selected less than 3 subjects and total number of votes is 125, not 144 (48x3) as it could have been expected if each of participants selected 3 options. Percentages are calculated by dividing number of votes for given subject by total polls participants, i.e. 48 voters (e.g. 9/48=19% for “6. Audit in entertaining context: books, videos”).


The most wanted subjects to be discussed in this blog are: option 3 – “audit methodology” (66%); option 5- “audit studies, research and other analytics” (54%); option 4 – “audit business, professional & regulation issues” (45%).
   

I would like to thank all my readers and those active people who participated in polls. My further blog posts would reflect your preferences. Actually I have already done that my last articles are related with mentioned subjects: Chinese Companies Need Vigilant Audit; Audit Firms: Financial Performance 2011; Audit Method: Audit Approach.
If you have any additional suggestions how to make blog more interesting you are welcome for comments.

Monday, February 6, 2012

Chinese Companies Need Vigilant Audit


Some of my readers have shown their interest to the assurance services in BRIC in the comments to the last post. And guess what? The recent issue of The Economist contains the article “Accounting in China”, which reflects my concerns about audit of companies from BRIC in general (see link). The beginning of the article is quite appealing:
“CAN you trust Chinese accounts? Many investors fear (and several short-sellers are betting) that the answer is “no”. Sino-Forest, a big forestry firm listed in Toronto, is a case in point. Last year Muddy Waters, a short-seller, accused it of running a Ponzi scheme, which it denies. On January 31st Sino-Forest released the final report of independent investigators into the charge. Insiders crow that the gumshoes found no smoking gun. The gumshoes grumbled that, lacking access to all the evidence, they were “not able to reach definitive conclusions”.
America’s SEC is trying to force the Shanghai office of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, a big Western accountancy firm, to hand over papers related to Longtop, a Chinese software firm that was delisted by the New York Stock Exchange last year. Deloitte refuses, saying this would violate Chinese laws on “state secrets”. Deloitte may have a point. If it co-operates, its local staff could be jailed under Chinese law.”
So, this is the question, which had to be raised sooner or later: can be the companies transparent while operating in the conditions of non-transparent political system? There are no big traditions of Chinese government accountability to citizens of China. The market incentives to provide true and fair financial statements are seem to be not enough.

How to deal with this issue?
China need not take all the blame for the failure to provide true financial statements. The problem is common for all emerging markets. It could be said that the reason for that is not necessarily deliberate misrepresentation. Errors might happen due to lack of knowledge, the absence of open communication tradition.
According to the article in The Economist one of the Big4 bosses acknowledged the issue and insisted that “the Big Four have greatly increased their vigilance in China”. To generalize this comment one can state an implicit rule for the audit of financial statements in emerging markets: the financial statement risk for all companies originated from emerging markets should be assessed as "high" at the beginning of audit unless otherwise could be proven. The proof of lower risk assessment could be obtained after one or two years of audit, which would provide evidence about low susceptibility of systems to errors and effective control system.
I agree that this proposal could be viewed as a strict and reactionary one, but I stated it to initiate discussion of what could be done regarding accounts provided by BRIC and other emerging markets. I expect you to share your valuable ideas in the comments, and we might discuss them.

PS Please, do not forget to vote for your top 3 favorite subjects. The polls are going on the right-hand side of the blog. The rules and explanations regarding subject are here.

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Audit Firms: Financial Performance 2011


What do we know about financial performance of accounting firms, especially the Big Four firms? I planned to do some analytics in this area and provide my readers with results this week. However, the smart guys from Big4 site have already done this work and all I want to do is to provide some additional considerations.
Thus, this blog post is going to discuss revenues of accounting firms.

Big4: Business as usual
The Table 1 represents revenues of the Big4 accounting firms and growth rates.
Table 1: Big4 Revenues and Growth Rates 

Figure 1: Combined Big4 Revenues

I would consider following points:
First, generally the Big4 firms have overcome consequences of financial crisis, i.e. revenue of 2011($103.6 bln.) exceeded the pre-crises level of 2008 ($101.3 bln.). However, E&Y did not manage to achieve pre-crisis revenues.
Second, PwC showed good performance in 2011 with 10% growth and regained dominant position in Big4 after it was given in to Deloitte in 2010.
Third, Deloitte is distinguished by the highest compound annual growth rate (CAGR) for the period of 2007-2011. Meanwhile, E&Y has reported the lowest CAGR of all Big4 firms.

Big4 Audit Services
The blog is about audit, so we can’t avoid talking about audit fees percentages in total revenue, which are reported in Table 2.  J

Table 2: Big4: Audit Fees Share in Total Revenue

Figure 2: Combined Big4 Audit Fees Share in Total Revenues

The sharp decrease of E&Y’s audit fees share in 2008 should not mislead us. The issue is that E&Y reported the combined figures of assurance and advisory services before 2008. That is why, for illustration purposes I depicted tendencies in audit/assurance revenues starting from 2008 year.
The tendency of decline in audit & assurance services might indicate two issues. First, the accounting firms are eager to provide consulting/advisory services, especially in economic crisis time, when clients need some advice on how to improve their businesses. Second, clients might be dissatisfied by the level of assurance services provided: accounting firms can not provide in this area something special because of strict unification of reports, or e.g. some clients wanted to delist themselves from stock exchanges. Anyway, this is a very deep and serious issue, which deserves to be discussed separately.     

Non-Big4 Accounting firms
I decided to compare information about Big4 firms with 2 big accounting global networks, BDO and Grant Thornton International (GTI). I picked up these 2 firms because they publish their reports online and information was rather accessible. According to Accountancy Age global ranking BDO and GTI, occupied 5th and 7th places respectively in 2010.

Table 3: BDO and GTI Revenues and Growth Rates

Figure 3: Combined BDO and GTI Revenues

Remarkably, the combined revenues of BDO and GTI are 2.4 times less than their closest Big4 rival, KPMG! BDO has shown good CAGR for 2007-2011, and what could be also mentioned is that the decline in revenues of -2% in 2009 was the lowest comparing with Big4 and GTI. Regretfully, GTI was not able to achieve pre-crises revenues ($4 bln.)

Non-Big4 Audit Services Share
I made the same exercise here as in case with Big4 to provide information about audit revenues, see Table 4 and Figure 4.

Table 4: BDO and GTI: Audit Fees Share in Total Revenue

Figure 4: Combined BDO and GTI Audit Fees Share in Total Revenues

Quite interesting is that the tendency for audit and assurance services growth in BDO and GTI differs from the one shown by Big4 firms. Both firms increased share of audit fees in structure of their revenues in 2009 (from 50% to 53%), and were able to keep these fees on the same level.
Unfortunately, the picture here could be distorted by BDO reporting. The firm reports audit and accounting under the same line. Though report does not specify what sorts of “accounting” services are provided, it might be suggested that these are the services related with help to clients in financial statements compilation, i.e. having non-assurance nature.

Comments are welcomed!
If you have anything to add about performance of Big4 or the other global accounting firms, please feel yourself comfortable to leave a comment. Maybe you have some insightful information about accounting firms’ balance sheets or cash flows J
PS Please, do not forget to vote for your top 3 favorite subjects. The polls are going on the right-hand side of the blog. The rules and explanations regarding subject are here.

Sources: 
1. Reports and press-releases placed on the web-sites of the mentioned firms.

Saturday, January 28, 2012

Week-End: Hero Accountants


I like to read books about history and sometimes notice the role, which accountants played in our daily live, not just in a professional field. Recently I have read an interesting book by Andrew Marr “The Making of Modern Britain”. The author described an interesting episode in the chapter about World War II, or the Peoples War like it is also  named in the UK. Here is the small passage:
“In the Atlantic, which mattered most to Britain, the capital surface ships became a sideshow. The life or death struggle was led from Brittany by Admiral Doenitz, the leader of the U-boat fleet, based in a sardine-merchant’s château; and in Britain by a polio-stricken civilian lawyer, Rodger Winn, who, along with a chartered accountant, ran the Royal Navy’s Submarine Tracking Room in an ugly concrete building near Downing Street. Their game of bluff, counter-bluff, changing tactics and secret intercepts was an important fight as any other part of the war.”

The British Submarine, Triton Class

Thus, a chartered accountant helping to navigate Royal Navy’s submarines contributed to the victory over Nazi Germany!
It is interesting which accounting skills did he applied to do this glorious job? I would suggest that he had good analytical skills, could have analyse trends in the movements of U-boats, accurately measured the balance of power at the point of time in the Atlantic
Unfortunately, the book does not tell us anything about this hero. Who was he? Why did he decide to take this job? What was his fate? It would be nice to get know about this man.

PS If you know any analogous stories about brave, heroic or simply good deeds of accountants which influenced our live, please leave a comment – share your knowledge.
PS2 Please, do not forget to vote for your top 3 favorite subjects. The polls are going on the right-hand side of the blog. The rules and explanations regarding subject are here.

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Audit Method: Audit Approach



Audit planning is one of the most interesting steps in the audit process. It requires to apply audit specific knowledge, business skills, understanding of the own resources and velocity of their usage.
In this post I am going to make the brief overview of some audit approaches and their applicability in real life.

Audit Process
The audit process could be depicted very simply, but work done and time spent on each stage of audit process have crucial effect on audit efficiency and effectiveness (audit risk). The illustration demonstrates that basically we have two types of approach: business risk approach with controls testing and substantive approach.
Audit Process
The approach in strategy should not be confused with approach in tactics regarding the concrete account connected with business process. In any case, we have to detect most risky and material areas of clients’ financial statements, i.e. substantive testing of all accounts is not reasonable.
         The second step is to identify our tactic regarding concrete type of account and assertion. For example, account is “fixed assets” (FA) and assertion is “valuation”. The process which is reflected by these two elements is “FA purchases” process. So at this point we might decide to test value of FA items substantively or do some preliminary purchases tests of controls to reduce substantive work in later stages. 

To test or not to test?
The outcome of control testing should be combined risk assessment of financial statement risk and audit risk, i.e. the result per well-known models:

         Audit Risk = Inherent Risk x Control Risk x Detection Risk (1);
Audit Risk = Financial Statement Risk x Detection Risk (2).

The audit firms try to formalize risk assessments (low, moderate, high) and spot the point at which it would be reasonable to reduce substantive procedures. However, there is still a problem: test of controls is time and money spent on procedures. And how do we know whether we should even start testing controls? What if after extensive control testing they proved to be ineffective? The mistakes might lead to inefficient audit, harming auditors’ profit margin. Unfortunately, I might say in majority cases the decision is made based on common sense and subjective opinion, i.e. there is no 100% proven scientific way to figure this out. Admittedly, to facilitate a right decision auditors should understand client’s business process, document suggested controls, and do process walk-through. There are also some rules of thumb, e.g. if there are lots of small routine transaction, then tests of controls are likely to be the right option.

Additional factors
The audit with accurate planning stage, through understanding of business processes and risk detection would require highly proficient audit team. However, we live in a real world and we do not always have access to the best dream audit teams J . The point is that the audit approach should be understandable by team members and fit their abilities: for someone it would be easier (time/budget factor) to vouch 1000 transaction than make decision based analytical job of connecting facts from process narrative, walk-through, initial strategy, and audit methodology. I mean, that process need not be overcomplicated. I would suggest following basic principles for establishing strategy:
  1. Efficiency (budget);
  2. Effectiveness (prudence, audit risk);
  3. Complexity/easiness to bring about;
  4. Understandability (and acceptability) for all members of team: from partner to audit staff.
In the future blog posts, it would be interesting to elaborate each of the above principles.

Conclusions
This is only outline of audit approaches. The topic is enormous and I will try to cover most arguable areas. Your comments are welcome as usual.
PS Please, do not forget to vote for your top 3 favorite subjects. The polls are going on the right-hand side of the blog.