Showing posts with label ISQC 1. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ISQC 1. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 13, 2016

Audit Method: Best practices in Audit Documentation

ISA 230, deal with the auditor’s responsibility to prepare the audit documentation. Audit Documentation is defined in ISA 230 as “The record of audit procedures performed, relevant audit evidence obtained, and conclusions the auditor reached (terms such as “working papers” or “workpapers” are also sometimes used).” The auditor shall prepare audit documentation that is sufficient to enable an experienced auditor, having no previous connection with the audit, to understand
  • ·         The nature, timing and extent of the audit procedures performed
  • ·         The results of the audit procedures performed
  • ·         Significant matters arising during the audit and the conclusions reached thereon

In documenting the nature, timing and extent of audit procedures performed, the auditor shall record:
  • ·         The identifying characteristics of the specific items or matters tested;
  • ·         Who performed the audit work and the date such work was completed; and
  • ·         Who reviewed the audit work performed and the date and extent of such review.

The auditor shall assemble the audit documentation in an audit file and complete the administrative process of assembling the final audit file on a timely basis. After the assembly of the final audit file has been completed, the auditor shall not delete or discard audit documentation of any nature before the end of its retention period.
Audit documentation may be recorded on paper or on electronic or other media. Examples of audit documentation include:
  • ·         Audit programs.
  • ·         Analyses.
  • ·         Issues memoranda.
  • ·         Summaries of significant matters.
  • ·         Letters of confirmation and representation.
  • ·         Checklists.
  • ·         Correspondence (including e-mail) concerning significant matters.

However it should be kept in mind that neither auditing standards nor any audit firm policy prohibits the audit team members from including documentation in the file that they believe necessary to support their work.

Practice

Documentation prepared after the audit work has been performed is likely to be less accurate than documentation prepared at the time such work is performed. ISQC 1, requires firms to establish policies and procedures for the timely completion of the assembly of audit files. An appropriate time limit within which to complete the assembly of the final audit file is ordinarily not more than 60 days after the date of the auditor’s report.

Wednesday, June 29, 2016

Audit Method: Client Acceptance Procedure

This first step in an audit engagement of client acceptance is very crucial where the practicing firm has to decide whether to accept the new client relationship or in case of existing client a periodic review whether to continue with the existing relationship. The decision to accept or continue an audit engagement depends on the client evaluation and ethical considerations.

As per paragraph 26 of ISQC-1, “The firm shall establish policies and procedures for the acceptance and continuance of client relationships and specific engagements, designed to provide the firm with reasonable assurance that it will only undertake or continue relationships and engagements where the firm:

  • Is competent to perform the engagement and has the capabilities, including time and resources, to do so;
  • Can comply with relevant ethical requirements; and
  • Has considered the integrity of the client”

If the issues have been identified, and the firm decides to accept or continue the client relationship or a specific engagement, the firm shall document how the issues were resolved.

As per paragraphs 12 and 13 of ISA-220 on Quality Control for an Audit of Financial Statements, the engagement partner shall be satisfied that the firm’s policies and procedures were duly followed in acceptance and continuation of client relationship and audit engagement and shall determine that the conclusions reached in this regard are appropriate.

The auditor shall be alert to and appropriately address the following threats while accepting a new engagement or continuing an existing one:

  • Self interest
  • Self-review
  • Familiarity
  • Intimidation
  • Advocacy

Practice


The auditor is generally more careful about accepting the new client because of lack of previous experience with the management and those charged with the governance and knowledge of the business, transactions and associated risks affecting the financial statements. While certain assessment procedures for both the prospective and existing clients would be common, however, they may assume additional importance in case of a new client.