Showing posts with label accounting firms. Show all posts
Showing posts with label accounting firms. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 27, 2015

Audit Firm: Audit Quality Indicators

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) is a nonprofit corporation in USA established by Congress to oversee the audits of public companies in order to protect investors and the public interest by promoting informative, accurate, and independent audit reports. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which created the PCAOB, required that auditors of U.S. public companies be subject to external and independent oversight.

The PCAOB has recently issued a concept release on Audit Quality Indicators (AQI). It has sought the public comment on the content and possible uses of a group of potential "audit quality indicators." The indicators are a potential portfolio of quantitative measures that may provide new insights about how to evaluate the quality of audits and how high quality audits are achieved.
The 28 potential Audit Quality Indicators are:

AUDIT PROFESSIONALS
Availability
Competence

Focus

1. Staffing Leverage 2.Partner Workload 3.Manager and Staff Workload 4.Technical Accounting and Auditing Resources 5.Persons with Specialized Skill and Knowledge

6.Experience of Audit Personnel 7.Industry Expertise of Audit Personnel 8.Turnoverof Audit Personnel 9.Amount of Audit Work Centralized at Service Centers10.Training Hours per Audit Professional

11.Audit Hours and Risk Areas
12.Allocation of Audit Hours to Phases of the Audit


AUDIT PROCESS
Tone at the Top and Leadership
Incentives

Independence

Infrastructure

Monitoring and Remediation

13.Results of Independent Survey of Firm Personnel
14.Quality Ratings and Compensation
15.Audit Fees, Effort, and Client Risk

16.Compliance with Independence Requirement
17.Investment in Infrastructure Supporting Quality Auditing

18.Audit Firms' Internal Quality Review Results
19.PCAOB Inspection Results 20.Technical Competency Testing


AUDIT RESULTS
Financial Statements

Internal Control

Going Concern

Communication between Auditors and Audit Committee
Enforcement and Litigation

21. Frequency and Impact of Financial Statement Restatements for Errors 22.Fraud and other Financial Reporting Misconduct 23.Inferring Audit Quality from Measures of Financial Reporting Quality
24.Timely Reporting of Internal Control Weaknesses

25.Timely Reporting
of Going Concern Issues
26.Results of Independent Surveys of Audit Committee Members

27. Trends in PCAOB and SEC Enforcement Proceedings
28.Trends in Private Litigation


Additional Thoughts

Quality control for audit is very important as only with an effective Quality control mechanism, the public interest can be served through independence, integrity, ethics, objectivity and quality performance. The aforementioned quality indicators can prove to be a useful benchmark for auditors to gauge their performance.

Thursday, October 22, 2015

Audit Firm: Vault Top 50 US Accounting Firms

Vault.com, an online careers site, has unveiled its annual ranking of the best accounting firms to work for in the U.S. Vault uses the following survey methodology to rank the audit firms.
Methodology: “When Vault asks accounting professionals what matters most to them in choosing an employer, they continually tell us that although prestige is important, it's not the only determining factor. In addition to prestige, accounting professionals find the following factors extremely important: firm culture, type of work, location, work/life balance, compensation, business outlook, and training opportunities.
As a result of these findings, Vault has compiled a weighted formula that reflects the issues job seekers care about most. We believe that this formula showcases those accounting firms deemed the Best to Work For. The Vault Accounting 50 is based on the following:
  • 40 percent prestige
  • 20 percent firm culture
  • 10 percent work/life balance
  • 10 percent compensation
  • 10 percent overall job satisfaction
  • 5 percent business outlook
  • 5 percent formal training

The top 10 Accounting/Auditing Firms in US at the Vault top 50 for 2016 are as follows.
  1. PwC (PricewaterhouseCoopers) LLP
  2. Ernst & Young LLP (EY)
  3. Deloitte LLP
  4. KPMG LLP
  5. Grant Thornton LLP
  6. BDO USA LLP
  7. McGladrey LLP
  8. Plante Moran
  9. Moss Adams LLP
  10. Crowe Horwath LLP

You can see the complete list of Top 50 Accounting firms by Vault at the under mentioned address:

Additional Thoughts

Accounting Firms should develop a congenial and friendly working environment for its employees and young graduate trainees so that they are developed and groomed professionally. A culture that promotes leadership, diversity, ideas generation will not only nurture the employees to grow professionally but will also bring good reputation for the firms locally and globally.

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Audit Firms: Financial Performance 2011


What do we know about financial performance of accounting firms, especially the Big Four firms? I planned to do some analytics in this area and provide my readers with results this week. However, the smart guys from Big4 site have already done this work and all I want to do is to provide some additional considerations.
Thus, this blog post is going to discuss revenues of accounting firms.

Big4: Business as usual
The Table 1 represents revenues of the Big4 accounting firms and growth rates.
Table 1: Big4 Revenues and Growth Rates 

Figure 1: Combined Big4 Revenues

I would consider following points:
First, generally the Big4 firms have overcome consequences of financial crisis, i.e. revenue of 2011($103.6 bln.) exceeded the pre-crises level of 2008 ($101.3 bln.). However, E&Y did not manage to achieve pre-crisis revenues.
Second, PwC showed good performance in 2011 with 10% growth and regained dominant position in Big4 after it was given in to Deloitte in 2010.
Third, Deloitte is distinguished by the highest compound annual growth rate (CAGR) for the period of 2007-2011. Meanwhile, E&Y has reported the lowest CAGR of all Big4 firms.

Big4 Audit Services
The blog is about audit, so we can’t avoid talking about audit fees percentages in total revenue, which are reported in Table 2.  J

Table 2: Big4: Audit Fees Share in Total Revenue

Figure 2: Combined Big4 Audit Fees Share in Total Revenues

The sharp decrease of E&Y’s audit fees share in 2008 should not mislead us. The issue is that E&Y reported the combined figures of assurance and advisory services before 2008. That is why, for illustration purposes I depicted tendencies in audit/assurance revenues starting from 2008 year.
The tendency of decline in audit & assurance services might indicate two issues. First, the accounting firms are eager to provide consulting/advisory services, especially in economic crisis time, when clients need some advice on how to improve their businesses. Second, clients might be dissatisfied by the level of assurance services provided: accounting firms can not provide in this area something special because of strict unification of reports, or e.g. some clients wanted to delist themselves from stock exchanges. Anyway, this is a very deep and serious issue, which deserves to be discussed separately.     

Non-Big4 Accounting firms
I decided to compare information about Big4 firms with 2 big accounting global networks, BDO and Grant Thornton International (GTI). I picked up these 2 firms because they publish their reports online and information was rather accessible. According to Accountancy Age global ranking BDO and GTI, occupied 5th and 7th places respectively in 2010.

Table 3: BDO and GTI Revenues and Growth Rates

Figure 3: Combined BDO and GTI Revenues

Remarkably, the combined revenues of BDO and GTI are 2.4 times less than their closest Big4 rival, KPMG! BDO has shown good CAGR for 2007-2011, and what could be also mentioned is that the decline in revenues of -2% in 2009 was the lowest comparing with Big4 and GTI. Regretfully, GTI was not able to achieve pre-crises revenues ($4 bln.)

Non-Big4 Audit Services Share
I made the same exercise here as in case with Big4 to provide information about audit revenues, see Table 4 and Figure 4.

Table 4: BDO and GTI: Audit Fees Share in Total Revenue

Figure 4: Combined BDO and GTI Audit Fees Share in Total Revenues

Quite interesting is that the tendency for audit and assurance services growth in BDO and GTI differs from the one shown by Big4 firms. Both firms increased share of audit fees in structure of their revenues in 2009 (from 50% to 53%), and were able to keep these fees on the same level.
Unfortunately, the picture here could be distorted by BDO reporting. The firm reports audit and accounting under the same line. Though report does not specify what sorts of “accounting” services are provided, it might be suggested that these are the services related with help to clients in financial statements compilation, i.e. having non-assurance nature.

Comments are welcomed!
If you have anything to add about performance of Big4 or the other global accounting firms, please feel yourself comfortable to leave a comment. Maybe you have some insightful information about accounting firms’ balance sheets or cash flows J
PS Please, do not forget to vote for your top 3 favorite subjects. The polls are going on the right-hand side of the blog. The rules and explanations regarding subject are here.

Sources: 
1. Reports and press-releases placed on the web-sites of the mentioned firms.