Wednesday, July 6, 2016

Audit Method: Quality Review

ISA 220, deals with quality control for an audit of financial statements. Engagement teams have a responsibility to implement quality control procedures that are applicable to the audit engagement and that are within the context of the firm’s system of quality control. The objective of the auditor is to implement quality control procedures at the engagement level that provide the auditor with reasonable assurance that:
  • The audit complies with professional standards and applicable legal and regulatory requirements; and
  • The auditor’s report issued is appropriate in the circumstances.

ISQC 1, deals with the firm’s responsibilities to establish and maintain its system of quality control for audit engagements. The system of quality control includes policies and procedures that address each of the following elements:
  • Leadership responsibilities for quality within the firm;
  • Relevant ethical requirements;
  • Acceptance and continuance of client relationships and specific engagements;
  • Human resources;
  • Engagement performance; and
  • Monitoring.

For audits of financial statements of listed entities, and those other audit engagements, if any, for which the firm has determined that an engagement quality control review is required, the engagement partner shall:
  • Determine that an engagement quality control reviewer has been appointed;
  • Discuss significant matters arising during the audit engagement, including those identified during the engagement quality control review, with the engagement quality control reviewer; and
  • Not date the auditor’s report until the completion of the engagement quality control review.

Practice

The engagement partner shall take responsibility for the overall quality on each audit engagement to which that partner is assigned. The engagement partner should ensure that


  • Appropriate procedures regarding the acceptance and continuance of client relationships and audit engagements have been followed;
  • All ethical requirements are met;
  • Independence criterion is met;
  • Assignment of team members is appropriate;
  • Overall direction, supervision and monitoring of the audit engagement is carried out.

Tuesday, July 5, 2016

Audit Firm: Impact of Brexit on Audit Firms in UK & Europe

On June 23, 2016, the UK voted to leave the European Union (EU) voluntarily. Amid the highest turnout at a UK-wide vote since 1992, with a 70% turnout rate, the Leave campaign received 52% of the referendum, compared to 48% received by the Remain campaign. The particulars of how the UK will leave the EU will be the subject of negotiations for at least the next two years.
Economists anticipate market and currency instability in the short-term, but the longer term implications will depend heavily on the details of how the UK unravels its participation in the EU. Economists are also anticipating several years of uncertainty, and uncertainty typically does not indicate positive signs for financial markets or economic indicators. Uncertainty among businesses would see a brake applied to investment and deal-making, which would hit one among the most lucrative of areas for accounting practitioners – transactional services market.
From one perspective, for the accountancy sector, the EU is maybe less important as the share of revenue generated by clients in other EU countries is just 4.2%. However, as key major companies and banks might relocate from London to Frankfurt in near future – this will mean a lot less money for accounting firms, but there may be a recovery later.

British relationships with the IASB, which lay outside the EU will remain unchanged. As the UK has always been a keen proponent of IFRS, thus it is unlikely that there would be any retreat to British accounting standards after Brexit. One more area on which accountants are focused are the potential tax implications. Taxation has remained a policy area over which EU member states retain close control. Now after the Brexit vote, EU laws on direct and indirect taxation will cease to apply within the UK, and Britain will regain the right to vary its VAT and excise duty rates beyond the restrictions imposed by EU legislation.

Workload is likely to increase for audit firms due to Brexit but their lucrative value-added services offerings may suffer as a result. Auditors would struggle to provide high-value advice to their clients, instead having to focus on technical questions borne out of the UK leaving the EU.

Additional Thoughts
Nobody can predict with certainty what is going to happen after the Brexit. It is an extraordinary event and determined by many unknown factors. The audit firms should consider what it will look like in the future and should assess their client base. To secure the longevity of the practice, audit firms need to ensure that their client base is well spread. 

References:

Thursday, June 30, 2016

#EYDisrupt

Have you considered the power of your connections? LinkedIn will present at our next #EYDisrupt event on 14 July. To RSVP please click here.


Wednesday, June 29, 2016

Audit Method: Client Acceptance Procedure

This first step in an audit engagement of client acceptance is very crucial where the practicing firm has to decide whether to accept the new client relationship or in case of existing client a periodic review whether to continue with the existing relationship. The decision to accept or continue an audit engagement depends on the client evaluation and ethical considerations.

As per paragraph 26 of ISQC-1, “The firm shall establish policies and procedures for the acceptance and continuance of client relationships and specific engagements, designed to provide the firm with reasonable assurance that it will only undertake or continue relationships and engagements where the firm:

  • Is competent to perform the engagement and has the capabilities, including time and resources, to do so;
  • Can comply with relevant ethical requirements; and
  • Has considered the integrity of the client”

If the issues have been identified, and the firm decides to accept or continue the client relationship or a specific engagement, the firm shall document how the issues were resolved.

As per paragraphs 12 and 13 of ISA-220 on Quality Control for an Audit of Financial Statements, the engagement partner shall be satisfied that the firm’s policies and procedures were duly followed in acceptance and continuation of client relationship and audit engagement and shall determine that the conclusions reached in this regard are appropriate.

The auditor shall be alert to and appropriately address the following threats while accepting a new engagement or continuing an existing one:

  • Self interest
  • Self-review
  • Familiarity
  • Intimidation
  • Advocacy

Practice


The auditor is generally more careful about accepting the new client because of lack of previous experience with the management and those charged with the governance and knowledge of the business, transactions and associated risks affecting the financial statements. While certain assessment procedures for both the prospective and existing clients would be common, however, they may assume additional importance in case of a new client.

Tuesday, June 28, 2016

Audit News Briefing: 28 June 2016

Audit-is-cool is pleased to accumulate and provide its readers with the news on audit and related topics:

June 27, 2016
AccountingWeb.com
Internal Controls Over Information Technology at Your Firm
American Institute of CPA awardee for Information Management & Technology Assurance, Sundeep Bablani wrote: “… enhancements in technology have significantly changed the outlook of evaluating controls from an auditor’s perspective.” This is about organizations’ reliance on manual controls in identifying unusual transactions. He explained the ‘integrated audit technique’ and emphasized on the necessity to conduct frequent IT audit evaluations in view of constant change in technology.

“Controls over technology have a direct impact on the overall reliability of financial statements regardless of the size of the organization. Financial auditors are therefore required to obtain a general understanding of information technology (IT) controls as part of their audits.”

June 24, 2016
AccountingToday.com
Will the Brexit Break E.U. Audit Firm Rotation?
Editor-in-chief Michael Cohn explained the impact of timing – when U.K. voted to “Brexit” from the E.U. only a week before the effectivity of the new rules for mandatory audit firm rotation.

His opinion states: “It’s probably too soon to say for sure. The mandatory audit firm provisions are only part of a wide-ranging set of audit market reforms now mandated in the E.U. They aim to force large public companies to tender requests for new audit firms at least every 10 years and to actually rotate audit firms at least every 20 years.”

He also disclosed a recent statistical finding by Ernst & Young that – One out of five large companies in the United Kingdom is “woefully unprepared” for the new EU rules on audit firm rotation.

June 14, 2016
Economia.ICAEW.com
Big Four will take in each other's dirty washing under new audit law, says Lord Hodgson
Pointing out concerns regarding the effect of the new regulation – The Statutory Auditors and Third Country Auditors Regulations 2016 (effective 17 June 2016), Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbots lobby for joint auditing: “The challenge to the government and the profession is: how do you achieve break-in to the magic circle? One way would be to encourage joint auditing.”

He raised lack of competition in the audit market – an issue that the new regulation failed to resolve: “These regulations are the produce of tired thinking. It is a shame that the profession and its regulators have not been able to think more creatively about the real issues and, instead, have fallen back on the old policy of, ‘If in doubt, stick in another regulation’.”

June 8, 2016
The Wall Street Journal

WSJ: Top 10 Audit Firms Now Audit 61% of SEC Registrants
Based on the recent data released by the Audit Analytics research provider, CFO Journal’s Senior Editor Maxwell Murphy marked the observation that audit work is now concentrated among fewer accounting firms. The reason – top 10 U.S. accounting firms have stepped up the share of corporate books they oversee.

·         3.8% increase from 2015 – top firms audit 60.7% of nearly 7,000 firms and funds under SEC audit regulation.
·         Global Six audit 96.8% of large multinational accounts of companies categorized as “accelerated filers”. The Big Four handle almost 91% of these audit work.
·         Global six also captured 2/3 or more of smaller accelerated filers and non-accelerated filers.

Audit Firm: PwC Chairman Interview

Petra Justenhoven recently sat down in Frankfurt with Dennis Nally, Chairman of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, to get his views on a range of issues and events related to the past year. 
Petra: Dennis, as people look through the 2015 Global Annual Review, despite some challenges, it seems like it was a very successful year for PwC.
Dennis: Overall, it was a very strong performance for PwC. The environment that we are dealing with today is challenging – whether it’s the global economy, the geopolitical issues, or the stiff competition. PwC performed really well with revenue growth of 10% putting us over the US$35 billion mark for the first time. We’ve got great momentum going into FY16, with much to build on. There’s a lot to be proud of across the PwC network.
Petra: You mention solid growth overall – do specific areas stand out?
Dennis: As we look at the results for the last 12 months, all of our lines of service showed really positive growth – led by Advisory which is up 18%, Tax up 7% and our Assurance business – notwithstanding some really difficult competitive market pressures – up 6%.
And when I look across the globe there are a lot of positives. I start with the US, the largest firm in our network, revenues up by an impressive 10%; our UK firm, a robust performance, up 9%; South America a strong result in a very challenging region – up 8%.
Growth in the Eurozone is challenging, as you well know, but I look at practices such as Italy up 11%, Germany 8% and France 6%, doing well in a very difficult marketplace
China is going through a lot of adjustments to its economy but our firm, the largest of all professional services firms in China, grew 8%.
And India, the fastest growing firm in the PwC network, up 17%.
And so, as I say, it gives us much to build upon as we head into FY16.
Petra: Coming back to Europe, you know that here the regulators are focused on audit, and even more on tax advice. What kind of impact does that have on PwC?

Dennis: Well, the regulatory environment continues to be very challenging, not just for us but for our clients. One of our biggest challenges is that the regulatory environment is not always aligned in all parts of the world. Also, the movement to mandatory firm rotation here in Europe is going to generate significant change for everyone – not only for the profession, but also for our clients as they implement the new rules.
Having the highest quality audits is the key to success and the foundation of our brand. Whilst we support reforms that will enhance audit quality, we don’t believe that mandatory firm rotation is going to achieve this. But the rules are the rules, and we will work with our clients to deal with these changes, whilst ensuring our quality remains of the highest standard.
As for tax reform, I think everyone agrees that in many cases tax regulations were written many years ago for a different type of global economy.
So we need tax rules that are really fit for purpose. With PwC having the largest tax practice in the world, we feel that it is a part of our responsibility to engage in that debate and to share our points of view and perspectives. And, of course, we’ll do so. But it is a challenge.
Petra: Eighteen months ago, PwC made history with our largest acquisition, Booz & Company, now known as Strategy&. How has that progressed?
Dennis: Without question it’s an incredibly strong move for PwC. The marketplace is continually telling us that the need to move from just providing advice to really dealing with solutions is an absolute must. The capabilities that Strategy& has brought into PwC allow us to do that.
But this is not just about advisory. The whole notion of going from strategy to concrete solutions is applicable to our assurance business and our tax practice. So we are very excited about Strategy&. We are well on our way to making this transaction a real success for PwC across the world.
Petra: In addition to acquisitions, PwC continues to develop joint business ventures and alliances – the most recent being with Google. Can you talk about that?
Dennis: Yes it’s a great point Petra, because I would say whether it’s Google or some of our other alliances with Oracle or Microsoft, we need to think about new ways of doing business.
The idea that as a professional services network we would house all of those capabilities within PwC is a model that’s really outdated.
We are working with Google in a number of areas, like cyber security, to co-create solutions for our clients. We bring in the content, they bring in the technology. So you can expect more of those types of arrangements in the future.
Petra: You just mentioned technology driving client services. What does technology mean for us?
Dennis: The whole issue of technology is clearly one of the most significant megatrends that we’ve seen. It’s transforming everything – whether it’s the digitalisation of business or the use of big data.
We have an important role to play in terms of how we help our clients, and obviously the alliances that we talked about will help facilitate that. But if this is disrupting our clients’ businesses, it’s going to disrupt PwC’s business as well. So we now think about the use of technology in a very different way, to provide better, more efficient services across the whole PwC network. Our aspiration is to become much more of a technology-enabled organisation.
Petra: You’ve talked about the focus on technology, but we are a people business.
Let’s step into the shoes of our future colleagues. So what would you say to persuade potential employees to join PwC?
Dennis: The world is such a dynamic place today – there are so many tremendous opportunities out there to help clients – it’s an exciting time to be part of a professional services network, and particularly PwC – so come join us!
I think PwC is unique because of our special focus on talent – not only attracting the best and brightest but how we help develop their careers, and give them the right kinds of experiences.
I like to say we help them build their résumé, we help them build their balance sheets. What we want to do is help individuals set goals that meet their needs, their timetable and their aspirations.
We want them to be part of a culture that allows everyone to succeed.
Petra: Has anything changed in terms of the kinds of people or skills we are looking for?
Dennis: Well, obviously the world is changing pretty rapidly, and so our talent needs to keep up with that. I talk about the necessity of every one of our people continually reinventing themselves and having a focus on progressing their own careers. We have talked a lot about technology, and having the ability to continually adapt to new technologies will be, I think, a real skill for the future.
But the world is so complex today, we need people who know how to work with teams, people who know how to collaborate, and who know how to listen. The whole issue of diversity and being able to work with different people with different backgrounds and cultures is a critical skill set. We help our people develop these skills and capabilities – that’s why I think it’s so exciting to be a part of PwC today.
Petra: You’ve mentioned diversity and I know PwC is involved in many programmes promoting diversity. Just this year we saw PwC joining a UN initiative called HeForShe. Could you talk about what we are doing in this area?
Dennis: I’m absolutely convinced that when we bring people together from different backgrounds – whether it’s gender or diverse types of capabilities – there is no question that the quality of our thought process is significantly enhanced. And so creating an environment where all of our people feel that they can make a contribution and that we value that contribution is critical for us.
We think HeForShe is a unique way to approach the diversity agenda – getting men across the PwC network to think about the issue of gender diversity in a different way. Sometimes I get a little frustrated that we are not making as much progress as we want to on the gender diversity issue, but PwC has a real focus on it – starting from the very top.
Petra: Many organisations are deliberating over their purpose. How would you define the Purpose of PwC?
Dennis: Given the world that we are operating in today, I believe every institution needs to have a clearly defined and articulated purpose.
For PwC, it’s about building trust in society and solving important problems. It starts with a fundamental premise that as an organisation that is over 160 years old and that’s providing substantial comfort to the capital markets, we believe we have an important role to help build trust in our society.
Secondly, there are some pretty challenging and difficult issues out there and resolving those problems is a real focal point for PwC.
A good example is our work in Norway to help develop a new clinical pathway for patients with acute stroke.
I see Purpose as our guiding light, who we are and what we are trying to get accomplished.


Petra: What do you think PwC will look like in 10 years, in 2025?
Dennis: Well, 2025 may be a little bit of a stretch – the world is moving so quickly. But we all know this global economy is so interconnected today, and to me that presents a lot of exciting opportunities. So at PwC we need to continue to evolve to deal with those issues and challenges.
That includes becoming much more of a technology-enabled organisation, and continuing to anticipate the solutions our clients will need in this ever-evolving business environment.
That translates into a lot of opportunities for all of our people, and to me that’s really the exciting part of the journey to 2025.
Petra: One last question before we close.
You will step down as the Global Chairman next year. Is there any final thought you would like to share?
Dennis: Well, first off I have a lot to do here over the next eight months or so, and I’m very much focused on what we are trying to achieve within the PwC network. But as I mentioned at the outset, we have a fabulous foundation to build upon, and I’m really excited about the momentum that we have in terms of what we are doing for clients and other stakeholders, and where we are trying to take the PwC network.
And I would sum up by saying it’s just a tremendous time to be in professional services and, more importantly, to be a part of PwC – it’s a chance to make a contribution that is value added and to really make a difference as you shape your career.
Petra: That’s a great message. Dennis, many thanks for your time and for sharing these insights with us.
Dennis: Thanks, great to be with you Petra.

Reference: