Audit in Politics: Russia vs Yukos vs PwC

There have been two events in recent days which triggered me to write post on this subject. First, last week The Economist published the article about auditing in China. Second, the recent decision of European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) regarding the Yukos vs. Russia case.

The article in The Economist considers the issue which happened between Deloitte and Longtop, a Chinese company once listed in NYSE. Here is remarkable abstract:

     “… After signing off Longtop’s financial statements for several years, the firm smelled trouble during its audit for the financial year that ended in March. Its subsequent questions did not go down well at Longtop, which seized some of Deloitte’s papers and threatened to keep Deloitte staff from leaving company premises. Deloitte quit as auditor, and Longtop’s shares ended up being delisted from the New York Stock Exchange in August.”

Subsequently, SEC issued subpoena for Deloitte’s audit working papers in relation to Longtop. After Deloiite’s refusal to cooperate the PCAOB threatened to decertify its Chinese division.

Medvedev and Putin

Several features of the above case look like Yukos-PwC affair which I would like analyse in several following articles. Yukos-PwC matter is perfect case for audit, accounting, tax and business ethics studies. It is rather complicated and requires accurate consideration of all facts. I am going to cover audit related professional and ethical issues. In this post I will give brief overview of the issue.

Essence of Issue

Yukos was one of the largest Russian oil companies with successful growth strategy and was listed on the LSE. However the company eventually had to file for bankruptcy (2006) after the Russian Ministry of Taxation proved in court (in 2003) that Yukos’ tax evasion amounted around $28 billion. The hypotheses standing behind this case are as follows:

1.      Tax evasion. This is obvious: company tried to pay less taxes using illegal schemes;

2.  Politically motivated expropriation of the company. The major shareholders and top-managers of Yukos, Mr. Khodorkovsky and Mr. Lebedev, were arrested in 2003 with criminal charges including tax evasion, fraud, forgery and embezzlement of assets. Meanwhile it is believed that Khodorkovsky and Lebedev had political ambitions and tried to influence state parliament by financing both left-wing and right-wing parties. Eventually, Mr. Putin being the president of Russia (now prime minister) decided to punish these independent oligarchs.

Khodorkovsky and Lebedev

The issue is that both hypotheses might be truthful partially. The fact is that similar tax evasion models were used at those time (and now used also) by almost all oil and gas companies in Russia and the only company which carried its part of punishment was Yukos. Nevertheless, I do not want to focus on this dispute, I am interested in the role of auditors in all this mess and here they come…  

Involvement of the Russian PwC firm

Unfortunately, PwC was an auditor of Yukos, acted as advisor on tax strategy, worked closely with Kodorkovsky on financial and accounting issues. After years of cooperation with client, PwC decided to withdraw its audit opinions in 2007 issued in respect of Yukos consolidated financial statements for 10 years from 1995 to 2004!

The Russian PwC office claimed that during tax investigation the prosecutors revealed new facts, which managers of Yukos misrepresented during previous audits. So what facts were revealed? The level of cooperation with client on tax issues was so close that there are significant doubts about this?

The other peculiar matter is that PwC-Cyprus has not withdrawn its audit opinions in respect of Yukos Cuprus subsidiaries.

Third, there are beliefs that Russian PwC was a coerced into opinion revocation by the Russian authorities.

Questions

Finally, based on the above overview I would like to raise following questions in my further blog posts:

·      What were the audit evidences, which had dramatic impact on PwC’s opinion?

·      Could Yukos case raise the same concerns of PCAOB about reliability of the Russian PwC audit working papers as in case Deloitte-Longtop affair?

·      Might the significant share of audit fees incoming from state owned giant company, Gazprom, somehow impact PwC’s decision?

·      What are ethical stances behind PwC deed?

The specialists, blogers who would like to contribute to the discussion of this issue and probably post their own article in “Audit is Cool” blog are welcomed (please send me message) or you can just leave your comment.

PS: Funny Reality

Here is the real phrase from Russian court ruling on the second case against Khodorkovsky and Lebedev (p. 613):

“… Khodorkovsky and Lebedev kept two sets of financial accounts (reporting per Russian Accounting Principles and US GAAP) and concealed from shareholders consolidated financial reports, by publishing them only in English language…”

This funny words were noticed by my friend in Livejournal, tema57 J

Sources:

The Economist. 2011. Auditing in China.September 17

The Wall Street Journal.2010. Oil Tycoon Says PWC Caved to Pressure. September 7

Financial Times.2010. Russia:Chain retraction. September 6.

Khodorkovky and Lebedev Communication Center:

·       http://www.khodorkovskycenter.com

·       http://www.khodorkovsky.ru/

Q&A from the defense team on the PwC investigation - A Q&A with the defense team inrelation to PwC's withdrawal of 10 years of its YUKOS audits

ECHR. 2011. Case of OAO neftyanaya kompaniya Yukos v. Russia. Applicationno. 14902/04

Second Case Ruling Khodorkovsky and Lebedev.2010

Ethical Auditor: Independence vs Rotation

Rotation

My previous post on ethics was rather popular, which gives me reasons to suggest that people are interested in auditors’ behavior and their place in business culture. Last week The Economist published interesting article about independence of auditors. Here are very appealing facts in the article:

    “… 1896 was also the year that Barclays, a British bank, chose an ancestor of PwC as its auditor, a relationship unbroken to this day. Fidelity is the norm in auditing. GE, Procter & Gamble and Dow Chemical have also clocked up centuries with their auditors. The average tenure for an auditor of a British FTSE 100 company is 48 years. Two-thirds of Germany’s DAX 30 have had their auditors for over 20 years.”

There are several opinions presented in article, one of which suggests that to address the issue it necessary to impose audit firm rotation. After reading I decided to discuss independence, because it is quite disputable area.

Current Situation: Partner Rotation

The literature on audit states that there is familiarity threat, which could arise between staff of audit firm and client. The risk is that auditor would lose professional scepticism because of too close relations with client. To address this issue official documents like SOX (in USA) and accounting codes like ACCA Code of Ethics and Conduct set specific requirements on audit partners rotation in case of dealing with listed (or public interest) clients. The requirements are as follows:

1.  Engagement partner should be rotated after 5 years;

2.    Other key audit partners should be rotated after 7 years;

3.    Partner responsible for quality control should be rotated after 7 years

However, current talks about rotation of firm suggest that above measures are not enough to provide independent audit opinion.

Who to Decide

Now we are coming to the point of appointing auditors on top management level. As known auditors, which expected to be appointed have to be approved by shareholders on annual general meetings. If shareholders did it for 100 years as in above case with Barclays then it all right. They bear all risks of such appointment and they should have understood it. 

However, in current stakeholder theory – shareholders are not the only persons who are affected by activity of listed Company. If it is “public interest entity” then the potential effect on other members of public gives right to public to interfere in the process of auditor appointment. I wrote about it in previous post considering proposals of European Commission on extra audit regulations.

The appointment of auditor becomes especially significant in case of financial institutions in our days as panic on market related with bankruptcies might jeopardize whole economy.

More Regulation – Better Results?

The above article gives example of number of studies which founded that rotations do not necessary results increase of audit quality. On the contrary, because of lack of client knowledge the quality might deteriorate. On the other hand, then it would be necessary to establish special rules for information transfer between auditors to provide better client understanding. The third point is that all these regulation might become too huge for auditors and add much more to existing bureaucracy in our profession.

What are your ideas in this issue, please share your thoughts in comments.  

Job Search: PwC Insight Day in Leeds

I continue to narrate about my adventures during my job search. This time I was lucky enough to accomplish 2 objectives: I visited rather interesting Leeds City and got information about PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) recruitment process.

As a result of PwC Insight Day I’ve understood that generally htis kind of event are useful in case:

·     you are graduate and want to enter graduate recruitment process;

·  you are experienced professional, but just want to get some insight about local office atmosphere and type of people you are expected to work with.

Generally PwC employees performed rather diligently for their grades. PwC associates (two-three years in audit practice firm) tried their best to give potential employees the idea of what they are doing in different departments of firm and were open to for questions.

What I found interesting is that PwC has established separate department for testing controls – “Risk Assurance”. Usually in audit firms we have separate department specialized in IT controls and applications. Risk assurance people in PwC deal with all kind controls, including manual. The risk assurance associate told me that they might even test manual controls for audit team in usual audit engagements. However, the ultimate goal of setting up this department, as I think, was to have trained employees specialized in compliance engagements, e.g. SOX.

In addition, I liked Leeds! It is a very cute town with nice architecture and great industrial history. Generally, the nice place to live and work.

Some Colour to Fraud Investigation

Lisa Weaver, the examiner of P7, wrote the article about forensic auditing in Student Accountant in 2008. I can not say it is the most jolly reading in the world, but I still  recommend it to all accountancy students for effective preparation to exam or job interview in forensic department.

In fact the fraud is highly tested area in all accountancy certification exams, in  ACCA (F8, P1,P7) and US CPA. I would like to add some “colour” to the considerations about fraud investigation engagements.

Types of Fraud

Ms Weaver kindly mentioned for us that there are three types of fraud:

·        corruption,

·        asset misappropriation,

·        financial statements fraud.

According to PwC’s report “Global Economic Crime Survey” her statement is very close to reality. I highly recommend to read that report, because it is quite interesting and practical product. PwC gives a table of the most popular economic crimes, which is in line with Weaver’s article:

Lets dive in financial statement fraud.

Financial Statement Fraud

Elliot and Elliot in their book state that inventory valuation gives lots of opportunities for creative accounting. Inferring from Treadway Comission Report they consider that ‘fraud often involved overstatement of revenues and assets with inventory fraud’ featuring understating bad debt allowances, overstating value of inventory. There are several groups of inventory related fraud: year-end manipulations, purchases not recorded (cut-off issues), fictitious transfers of non-existent inventory, carrying obsolete inventory at a cost, reducing cost of goods sold by adjusting journal entries.

Fraud and Bankruptcies

Gaughan, referring to Dun & Bradstreet research, noted than in 2000s number of bankruptcies related with fraud significantly increased. WorldCom, Enron, Adelfia, Refco, Parmalat were ‘brought down by management fraud’. He also mentioned BancruptcyData.com table of the largest bankruptcies. I have found it’s updated version since he has written his book, here it is:

As we already know accounting fraud (so called, ‘Repo 105’) was also involved in Lehman’s case. Though it was not the primary reason for their collapse, but still conceal of fraud contributed to the overall situation. This is how Sikka describes this case in his article:

‘Lehman’s own accounting personnel described Repo 105 transactions as an “accounting gimmick” and a “lazy way of managing the balance sheet as opposed to legitimately meeting balance sheet targets at quarter end”, but the bank received a clean bill of health from auditors Ernst & Young. The insolvency examiner was critical of auditors and protracted litigation will follow.’

By The Way

There is a special certification of specialists in fraud investigations which is carried out by Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. CFEs are the guys, just like us, accountants J However, additionally to common accountancy subjects they study things as criminology and have special training to present evidence in court.

By the way, have you ever been involved in fraud investigations or may be you performed fraud investigation procedures within audit engagements? Please share information. 

References

Elliot, B. and Elliot, J. (2007). Financial Accounting and Reporting. 11^th Edition. Pearson Education Ltd.

BankruptcyData.com (2010). Site Link:

 http://www.bankruptcydata.com/Research/Largest_Overall_All-Time.pdf

Gaughan, P.A. (2007). Mergers, Acquisitions and Corporate Restructurings. Forth Edition. John Wiley and Sons Inc.

PwC. (2009) Global Economic Crime Survey: Economic Crime in a Downturn. November 2009, PwC

Sikka, P. (2011).The EU man cometh. PQ Magazine. No. 1, p. 27.

Weaver, L. (2008). Forensic Auditing. Student Accountant. September 2008, p. 58-60.

Ethical Auditor: Being Holier than the Pope

     Ethics issues in business have been always matter of discussions. Audit profession is especially subject of this arguments. Probably only medical workers have as sound ethical principles as auditors do.

     In the beginning

     IFAC code of ethics explains this phenomena in following way: ‘A distinguishing mark of the accountancy profession is its acceptance of the responsibility to act in the public interest. Therefore, a professional accountant’s responsibility is not exclusively to satisfy the needs of an individual client or employer’. European Commission acknowledges this fact by emphasizing that auditor has to fulfill societal mandate.

     Unfortunately these statements do not stick in the mind of young beginning auditors. It is very rare if anyone from accounting firm’s HR or management would ask candidates during interview: “Do you really aware that you are going to hold societal mandate and act in public interest?” It a fantasy, isn’t? Especially for accounting firms operating in emerging markets with low level of law enforcement and legal awareness of society.

     Men and women of principles

     At this point I think I must list fundamental principals auditor’s ethics:

• Integrity
• Objectivity
• Professional Competence and Due Care
• Confidentiality
• Professional Behavior

     The principles are really very bright and constitute best moral qualities of humanity. For example, integrity means that auditor being honest should never allow his/her name to be associated with something dishonest. Professional behavior means that auditor must comply with relevant laws and regulations and avoid any action that may bring discredit to the profession. As my honorable lecturer, John Stead, says that ‘it is not just a coat you put on when you go to the work in the morning and leave the office in the evening, it is an attitude of mind’. May be it is not the newest thought in the world, but I like the reasonableness and fairness of these words.

     Of course! When students hear such things from their lecturers there are ironic smiles on their faces. They know that human beings tend to lie and act irresponsibly in their own interest, because human beings are not perfect from birth.

     Some illustrations. For example, I am shareholder and I do not want financials of my company to be audited by the guys who illegally download some software/music from internet. They commit crime and if this information becomes public this would negatively impact audit profession. Or, for example, audit partner is in cahoots with criminal authoritarian government members. Is it just a friendship or something related with corruption? We do not know, but reputation of audit partner willingly or not would be damaged at this case. There are no immaterial things here – even if you are stowaway in a bus, it still matters!

    Another good point is that ethics is not only, auditor knows if he is guilty (ethical) or not guilty (non-ethical). It is also about public perception of auditors’ actions.  If society believes that private relationships of audit partner and CFO matter even if auditor sure that it is 100% does not matter, the society is right.

     On the other hand, we are not saint. There is always compromise. The relevant rule here is: “Do not do silly things”. In my opinion, for different people different ethical issues matter. Moreover, I think that the most ethical values are grounded in childhood and youth. If future auditor failed to recognize an ethical issue at the age of 18 it most likely that he/she would struggle to recognize it in adult ages even after completing ethics courses.

     Ethics models

    David Campbell, the examiner of P1 in ACCA qualification, have several useful tips in his article in Student Accountant magazine. He briefly described features of two ethics models: American Accounting Association model with seven steps and Tucker’s 5-question model. I will place here just major points of model, the article is freely available and you can read details there.

       I think they are very clear and useful, even in daily live.

      

       

References:

Campbell, D. (2008). Work ethics. Student Accountant. March 2008, p. 56-59

IFAC (2006). Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants. IFAC, New York