Audit News Briefing: 24 December 2015

Audit-is-cool is pleased to accumulate and provide its readers with the news on audit and related topics:

December 16, 2015

Reuters - dailymail.co.uk

Accounting firms, SEC hobble U.S. audit watchdog

"U.S. rule-making is a complex process that involves people with many different perspectives who care deeply about the issues… I think this is the case with the PCAOB and SEC in the work we do together, including proposals to give more information to investors about who is leading the audits of the companies in which they invest." This is what PCAOB chief Doty said in a written statement during the annual accounting-industry gala. James Schnurr, who is just two months into his job as chief accountant at U.S. SEC also addressed auditing failures that had shaken public confidence in recent years. Investigative journalist Charles Levinson enumerated all exchanges of thoughts and surrounding events of this so-called hobble.

Please follow link for details: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/reuters/article-3362563/Accounting-firms-SEC-hobble-U-S-audit-watchdog.html

December 15, 2015

The Wall Street Journal

Regulator Approves Naming of Audit-Firm Partners in Charge of Corporate Audits

Under the long policy aim to make auditors more accountable – Beginning with audits performed in 2017, audit firms will have to name their “engagement partner” in charge of each audit in a new form to be filed with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. The PCAOB voted unanimously last December 15 (Tuesday) to enact the proposal, which is still subject to Securities and Exchange Commission approval.

Please follow link for details: http://www.wsj.com/articles/regulator-approves-naming-of-audit-firm-partners-in-charge-of-corporate-audits-1450198985

December 10, 2015

Street Insider

SEC Suspends Five Public Accountants and Two Audit Firms for Bad Auditing

“Auditors must follow the professional standards and avoid conflicts of interest when they opine on the financial information reported by public companies… These accountants and their firms showed complete disregard for the basic rules of their profession. As a result, they are now barred from working on any SEC-related matters.”

This was the pronouncement of Director Paul G. Levenson of the SEC’s Boston Regional Office. The government regulator suspended five accountants and two audit firms from practicing or appearing before the SEC after they violated key rules that are designed to preserve the integrity of the financial reporting system.

According to the SEC’s orders finding violations by Peter Messineo and his firm Messineo & Co., Charles Klein and his firm DKM Certified Public Accountants, Robin Bigalke, Joseph Mohr, and Richard Confessore:

·         Messineo and his firm, which had more than 70 corporate clients, skipped mandatory quality reviews for their own audits and performed deficient quality reviews for audits by another audit firm.

·         To cover up these violations, Bigalke falsified and backdated audit documents in her role as Messineo & Co.’s senior accountant. She also arranged with Mohr, the firm’s quality reviewer, the backdating of quality review documents.

·         Mohr falsely identified himself as a certified public accountant during a time when was not licensed as a CPA.

·         Messineo served as the CFO of two public companies being audited by Klein and DKM. Messineo falsely certified the companies’ public filings despite knowing that auditor independence rules were being violated as Confessore was improperly serving conflicting roles as a member of the DKM audit team and an employee of Messineo & Co.

·         After Messineo resigned from his CFO positions at both public companies, he merged his audit firm into DKM and exacerbated DKM’s independence issues because he retained ownership interests in the two companies while DKM continued to audit them.

Please follow link for details: http://www.streetinsider.com/Litigation/SEC+Suspends+Five+Public+Accountants+and+Two+Audit+Firms+for+Bad+Auditing/11144504.html

Audit Method: Small Business Audit

An audit is designed to evaluate and verify the effectiveness of company’s financial operations. It can also help the management or owner detect circumstances that could lead to financial problems in the future.

But the audit strategies used on bigger companies may not be applied for audits of a small business.  Big companies can rely on their own internal auditors to provide assistance.  But small businesses, given a limited budget, have limited personnel.  With this, auditors of a small business might also need to adjust their audit strategy.

Auditors of a small business may encounter some challenges that affect their audit strategy since small businesses face certain challenges in executing effective internal control, particularly if management of the business perceives internal control as something to be added on rather than integrated with core processes.

Audit in a small businesses is very important so as to minimize the potential risks of material misstatements in the financial statements whether it is caused by error or fraud.

So what do Auditors need to pay attention on auditing a small businesses?

First, auditors should review the systems and examine financial documentation whether it is being processed in a timely manner. Without timely and reliable information, accounting records can become unreliable that may create discrepancies in a company's financial records.

Second, auditors should identify and review each component of the company's accounting system, including journal entries, T-Accounts, general ledger and financial statements.  Analytically work through the accounting system to ensure that all accounts are present, that all journal entries are posted to the general ledger in a timely manner and that the system has the ability to correct human errors, such as calculation errors.

Third, auditors should check into the company's internal controls policies to measure the level of security they provide from theft and fraud.  

Fourth, auditor should compare internal records of cash possessions, income and expenses against external records.   The auditor should check the company's stored external records and compare selected transactions against internal records.   For example, a purchase receipts sent from suppliers for a certain month will be compared against internal purchase records, or compare cash register tapes against revenue recorded on the books.

And finally, auditors should analyze the company's internal tax records and official tax returns.  Auditors should also take a little extra time to review the range of credits and deductions claimed on the most recent tax return, looking for areas of dubious reporting, such as inflated expense numbers.

Efficiency in audit is achieved through a careful audit planning.   One specific example is that auditors review the prior years’ workpapers to familiarize themselves with client issues and to look for past inefficiencies and possible improvements.  Another factor that contributes to audit efficiency is Auditors’ independence and objectivity.  Auditors should be free from bias, conflict of interest and undue influence of others to override professional judgements

Sources: 

http://smallbusiness.chron.com/conduct-financial-audit-10228.html

Audit Firm: Interview with KPMG Partner

Audit-is-cool presents an excerpt from the Interview of Simon Collins (Chairman & Senior Partner KPMG UK).

Lane Mean: Hi, I am Lane Mean, I am content director of local world newspapers and I am introducing this evening Simon Collins. Simon is the chairman of the KPMG group, one of the big four. The debate tonight is actually being sponsored by the Bristol Post.

Simon you are seen as something of an inspirational leader in accountancy terms in the big four. How have you achieved this do you think? Because you were actually voted in as chairman by your peers, were not you?

Simon: Yes we had a pretty full blooded election, so it‘s a real democracy. 600 partners chose who they wanted to lead the firm for the next five years.

Lane Mean: So why do you think you won that?

Simon: I think you would have to ask the 600 truthfully but I think you the sort of messages I think were important to the partners were about a clear sense of purpose and direction about where the business goes, where it fits in society and a very big theme for me was how we put trust and respect back into business and the accountancy profession and KPMG.

Lane mean: And how do we because, I mean I am not bracketing you in the same way as bankers, but a lot of mistrust in the financial area is not there?

Simon: I think there is a huge amount of mistrust, I think broken is the only way to put it between business generally and society and I think there is a number of reasons    for that .We have got in almost every industry there is an example of behaviors that you cannot hold up and say that‘s what good business is. So whether it’s pharmaceuticals and rivalry, whether it’s horse meat, whether it’s liable miss–selling, whether its tax, every industry has got something that damages trust. So I think we have got a long slow journey to claw that back through good behavior and actually concentrating on doing the right.

Lane Mean: But how can you hope to do that because you have got loads and loads of partners have not you?

Simon: I don’t think that in a sense is the difficult bit, I mean certainly for us as a firm we have integrity and responsibility really close to our hearts and frankly the partnership model is really good. I don’t think I have got a single partner who does not care passionately about leaving the business in better shape than they find it and so doing the right thing, I think comes naturally.

Lane Mean: Yeah I mean the right thing, so what is right thing for a member of the “big four” like KPMG?

Simon: The right thing is to advise clients responsibly, to behave with integrity, to be a true commercial animal. I make no apology for profit being a big part of what we are trying to achieve to be sustainable business you have to make profit you have to be successful, but to be sustainable and to pass on a better business you also have to have at least a benign footprint in society, better still if business can actually contribute to society and leave good behind.

Lane Mean: Is it ethical to advise people to dodge tax do you think?

Simon: No if you ask question like that, no. Is it ethical to take advantage of legislation that   specifically encourages companies to locate in the UK and to take advantage of tax breaks yes. So I think where we get into trouble in part of that trust equation is when there is a lack of clarity about what we‘re talking about. Genuinely agree just bad behavior in tax planning is immoral, just outright wrong  and we condemn  it, the big accounting firms will have nothing to do  with it , utilizing tax breaks that are specifically put in place by government to compete  internationally, to encourage investment and people to come here and do business is a really good thing  to do. Good things to do for society at large and we get mixed up with that.

Lane Mean: But when we see companies going before select parliamentary committees as we have done and being frankly terribly embarrassed, I am not saying that you are involved with any of those people ,but it’s not good is it when the public sees that?

Simon: No it’s really bad for trust  but I think what we  have got to look at is several  things , you have got to look  at whether companies have been lawful and then whether politicians and society like the outcome of them being lawful, so if you look at some of big companies in the news for paying low headline rates of corporation tax ,that looks on the face of it  something that doesn’t work  for  society, but they have got  there without a breach of law at all, and in fact  in many cases they have  got there  specifically taking advantage of  things the government,  successive governments  have intended them to do. If society and government does not  like the result of that , which is that company X only pay 5p in the pound corporation tax, for me and for the profession. I think that’s a problem for legislators and not a problem to parcel out to tax advisers.

Lane Mean: No, now the day after the election, the budget rather, not the election, we are talking, I mean if you were in number 11.What would you do in terms of your first budget if it was yesterday? Have you got some thoughts on that?

Simon: I think that I wake up many days grateful. I am not in number 11 or politics generally, and I think one of big problem on number 11 anytime. NOW or recently is being not a great deal of money or flexibility to do things. it seems to me what the chancellor was looking to do, was to encourage growth in the economy to make the cake bigger and actually to get Britain exporting again, manufacturing again, and to the extent the limited money available was directed in those directions, actually I think it was a pretty decent budget for business.

Lane Mean: what about the grey vote, now lots there wasn’t there? Lots to encourage people retired people, to vote for the coalition in a year’s time?

Simon: I don’t know about voting, I think there was a lot for savers and there probability is, I think you’re right ,there’s probably a correlation between savers and the grey pound and so on .I think there was a lot there to actually encourage saving and actually investment indirectly as well and I think again you know that goes around in a virtuous circle for me with encouraging investment in industry and growth in manufacturing and so on ,so I don’t know ,I am sure, you’d have to ask the chancellor what his political ambitions were around those things, but from an economics point of view I think they made perfect sense.

Lane Mean: So what are you advising your clients from today on about how they see the next couple of years? Because you know we are going into election in a year’s time you will have a view about that?

Simon: Well it’s not so much political thought what we have got .we have got 24 offices up and down the country ,we look after companies from relatively small companies right through to the multinationals what we are seeing is a definite uptick in sentiment .definitely a more positive feel from our clients up and down the country .manufacturing, export, every, one feeling a little bit brighter .The growth figures support that ,job creation support s that ,so I think for the first time in quite a few years we have got what I would describe as a “benign back cloth “for business to plan .now we have also got some uncertainties we have still got very topical things around the Ukraine and political uncertainty, geo-political uncertainty if you like, Scottish independence is worrying people it’s not much that business should have or does have an outright view of right or wrong it’s simply uncertainty .So we have got, now we are in march, we have got general election next may. Business does not like uncertainty. On the other hand it’s learnt to cope with it, and I think overall watch for uncertainty, but invest into that “benign back cloth”.

Lane Mean: And what about you? You have got a five year plan.   I guess in your head? You are an accountant, accountant plan, so what’s the five years plan?

Simon: The five year plan, if you start at what I think of as sort of 70,000 feet, the five year plan is to leave behind a better business after my period of leadership than I inherited, and I think all leaders should have that in mind. I want to leave the business prouder, financially stronger and with a better footprint in the communities what you referred to earlier, than I found it.

Source

Complete Interview can be watched at the following link.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jg6_RlcZBV4

http://www.kpmg.com/uk/en/about/aboutkpmg/kpmgfoundation/pages/simon-collins.aspx

i-Monday: Every Person is Important

“Without realizing it, we fill important places in each other’s lives. It’s that way with the guy at the corner grocery, the mechanic at the local garage, the family doctor, teachers, neighbors, coworkers. Good people who are always “there,” who can be relied upon in small, important ways. People who teach us, bless us, encourage us, support us, uplift us in the dailiness of life. We never tell them. I don’t know why, but we don’t.

And, of course, we fill that role ourselves. There are those who depend in us, watch us, learn from us, take from us. And we never know.

You may never have proof of your importance, but you are more important than you think. There are always those who couldn’t do without you. The rub is that you don’t always know who.”

This quote teaches us that every person we encounter in our lives is important. We might not see it or understand it right away, but eventually, we will. And, later on, we will begin to understand that we are equally as significant in the lives of those around us as well. Even if we don’t know how or why we are important, or to who exactly we are important to, we need to know that we are; everyone is.

From: This quote is from “All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten”, written by Robert Fulghum is an American Author, and the book from which the quote is from is how he came to fame. “All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten” was all about seeing the world from a child’s eyes, which became a worldwide phenomenon when it became published in 1988.

Picture reference:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1a/Robert_Fulghum.jpg/547px-Robert_Fulghum.jpg

Week-end: Work-Life Balance

Work life balance is a concept including proper prioritizing between work (career and ambition) and lifestyle (health, pleasure, leisure, family and spiritual development/meditation). It is a concept that supports the efforts of employees to split their time and energy between work and the other important aspects of their lives. It is a daily effort to make time for family, friends, community participation, spirituality, personal growth, self-care, and other personal activities in addition to the demands of workplace. Effective work-life balance encourages employees to work harder and discourage them from quitting their jobs. Work life balance means something different to every individual, but health and career experts share some tips to help you find the balance that’s right for you. The key to avoid burning is to let go of perfectionism, says executive coach Marilyn Puder-York PhD, who wrote the official Survival Guide. As life gets more expanded its very hard both neurologically and psychologically to bring perfection. She recommend dedicating a few chunks of time each week to self -care, whether its exercise, yoga or meditation. First identify what is most important in your life and then draw firm boundaries’ so you can devote quality time to these high priority people and activities.

Puder-York concluded the work life balance by saying that “When I talk about balance, it does not mean completion and achievement of every task, but it mean that you will get a time for self care, so that your body, mind and soul are being refreshed.”

Sources: 

http://www.forbes.com/sites/deborahlee/2014/10/20/6-tips-for-better-work-life-balance/

Audit Method: The Unrecorded Liability

Liability is defined in Conceptual Framework of International Financial Reporting Standards as “a present obligation of the entity arising from past events, the settlement of which is expected to result in an outflow from the entity of resources embodying economic benefits”.

There can be many instances where management will be prone to not record a liability due to various reasons. The management may not record a current liability to improve its current ratio and present its liquidity position higher. Management may also skip to record a long term liability at year end to improver it debt to equity ratio. A high current ratio and low debt to equity ratio makes it easy for the management to obtain new financing for the company.

Auditor should verify the unrecorded liability by applying the following procedures:

• Vouch a sample of cash disbursements recorded just after year end to receiving reports and vendor invoices. In a voucher system, a voucher is not prepared until the requisition, receiving report, and sellers invoice are reconciled with the purchase order.  Auditors search open files for unmatched documents.
• In searching for unrecorded payables, the auditor would look at disbursements made after year end to see if they should have been, and were, properly recorded as payables at year end.
• Tracing a sample of purchase orders and the related receiving reports to the purchases journal and the cash disbursements journal will enable the auditor to determine that the purchases were properly recorded.
• Analytical procedures.  Accounts payable turnover is very important.   Unusual relations should be investigated.
• Cash disbursements cutoff test.  Test if cash disbursement and accounts payable reduction are reconcilable. Inspect the last checque written and trace it to the accounts payable subsidiary ledger. Reviewing subsequent cash disbursements enables the auditor to detect items purchased before year end but not yet recorded, i.e., unrecorded accounts payable.
• Purchases cutoff test tests to determine if goods for which title has passed or not passed are appropriately accounted for. FOB shipping point and FOB destination are critical to this test.
• Trace subsequent payments to recorded payables.  Match checques issued subsequent to year end with the related payable.  Checque should be issued only for payables that existed on the balance sheet at year end.  Any checque that cannot be matched may represent an unrecorded liability at year end.
• If confirmations are used, small and zero balances should be sampled as well as large balances.  For example, if orders are placed with a vendor on a consistent basis, a confirmation should be sent to the vendor regardless of the balance due at year end.

Practice

The auditor should check for all the audit assertions while verifying unrecorded liabilities. Valuation assertion will verify whether accounts payable are valued in accord with GAAP/IFRS? Presentation/Disclosure assertion will verify whether the accounts liability balances are properly presented and disclosed? Accounts payable should be listed as a current liability.  Purchases should be listed in the calculation of cost of goods sold. Unusual transactions involving accounts payable should be disclosed, such as related party transactions involving accounts payable. Obtain a management representation letter with assertions relating to accounts payable and purchases.

Audit News Briefing: 15 December 2015

Audit-is-cool is pleased to accumulate and provide its readers with the news on audit and related topics:

December 8, 2015

Accountancy Age

Audit firm governance code to champion quality and transparency

Based on the feedback from early-year consultation of the Audit Firm Governance Code provisions held by FRC – the role of independent non-executives was revealed to be significant but could be further strengthened. Moreover, investors require more direct appraisal from NED regarding firms’ audit performances.

FRC CEO, Stephen Haddrill said: "The audit firm governance code has led to an enhancement in governance of the major firms who have put significant effort into adopting its key provisions… Above all it creates, through the independent non-executives, an independent voice and challenge at the heart of the firms, which is of particular importance in view of their public interest responsibilities. The proposed new provisions will strengthen this voice further, provide clarity about the code's purpose particularly in relation to audit quality and encourage further transparency to investors."

Please follow link for details: http://www.accountancyage.com/aa/news/2438245/audit-firm-governance-code-to-champion-quality-and-transparency

December 7, 2015

PwC

PwC appointed as auditor to probe Vatican finances

PwC shall conduct a comprehensive external audit of the Vatican’s accounts. This is to support the Pope in his zeal to excommunicate corruption from the church. The Big Four shall work with Australian Cardinal George Pell who is head of secretariat that was formed to oversee papal finances following a series of scandals.

Please follow link for details: http://www.accountancyage.com/aa/news/2438045/pwc-appointed-as-auditor-to-probe-vatican-finances

December 4, 2015

Accounting Today

U.S.: Litigation Environment Favorable for Audit Firms (for Now)

Law firm Willkie Farr & Gallagher partner, Michael Young, specializes in defending audit firms. He said in an auditing conference in New York that –

“The litigation environment toward the accounting profession right now is about the best I have seen it in more than 30 years of doing this… Litigation against the profession is down, and just as important, the ability of the profession to effectively tell its story, to effectively present its defenses, is better than at any other time while I have been practicing law. But the times are changing, and in fact they have already started to change.”

Much of the litigation in recent years has come from the financial crisis but SEC is sending the message that it is back on the accounting beat, Young warned.

Please follow link for details: http://www.accountingtoday.com/blogs/debits-credits/news/litigation-environment-favorable-for-audit-firms-for-now-76616-1.html

Audit Firm: KPMG Staff Arrested in Tax evasion Investigation

Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs-HM Revenue and Customs or HMRC is a non-ministerial department of the UK Government responsible for the collection of taxes, the payment of some forms of state support, and the administration of other regulatory regimes including the national minimum wage.

Four partners at the Belfast office of KPMG have been arrested in connection with suspected tax evasion. HMRC officials visited the global accountancy firm's city Centre office on Wednesday and detained the men. They are Jon D'Arcy, Eamonn Donaghy, Arthur O'Brien and Paul Hollway, the firm's most senior staff in Northern Ireland.

KPMG said it is cooperating with the investigation and the four men have been placed on "administrative leave". The firm added that it does not have "any indication that this investigation relates to the business of KPMG or the business of our clients". The firm added that it does not have “any indication that this investigation relates to the business of KPMG or the business of our clients”.

HMRC said: “Officers arrested four individuals from Northern Ireland [on Wednesday] in connection with suspected tax evasion. We can’t comment further.”

KPMG has been at the fore of a campaign to persuade the Treasury to grant Northern Ireland special corporation tax status. Among the other KPMG executives arrested on Wednesday was Paul Hollway who is the firm’s head of corporate finance in Ireland. Mr Donaghy is KPMG's head of tax in Belfast and has been heavily involved in the campaign to have corporation tax powers devolved to the Northern Ireland Executive. As well as their work for KPMG, the four men are directors of a property investment company called JEAP Ltd. The firm suffered heavy financial losses when the property market crashed in 2008. However, it is unclear at this stage if that forms part of the HMRC investigation.

Additional Thoughts

Tax evasion and tax avoidance are issues which require the utmost care and attention from the auditors and authorities as economy can suffer huge losses due to this. Auditors should be very careful and should look out for transactions and other matters which may indicate the possible tax evasion. Moreover while providing taxation consulting services to its corporate clients the auditors should ask for all the pertinent information from clients to avoid any chance of the possible tax evasion.

Sources:

• http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-34931675
• http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/nov/26/kpmg-partners-arrested-hmrc-tax-evasion-inquiry

Audit News Briefing: 3 December 2015

Audit-is-cool is pleased to accumulate and provide its readers with the news on audit and related topics:

December 2, 2015

Accounting Today

SEC Penalizes Grant Thornton for Ignoring Red Flags in Audits

In a statement – SEC’s Division of Enforcement Director Andrew J. Ceresney said that “Audit firms must be held responsible when systemic failures such as inadequate engagement procedures, staffing, or supervision cause the firms’ work to fall significantly short of expected standards, particularly when multiple audits and engagements are involved.”

During audits of two public traded companies under SEC enforcement actions, Grant Thornton and two of its partners disregarded red flags and fraud risks. For improper accounting and other violations, the firm has agreed to pay $4.5 million to settle charges. They admitted wrongdoing and agreed to forfeit approximately $1.5 million in audit fees and interest plus pay a $3 million penalty.

Please follow link for details: http://www.accountingtoday.com/news/audit-accounting/sec-penalizes-grant-thornton-for-ignoring-red-flags-in-audits-76580-1.html

December 1, 2015

PwC

Our focus on audit quality

PwC Assurance Quality Managing Partner Michael Gallagher:

“We understand the importance of maintaining our focus on delivering quality, being transparent about our process, continuously investing in innovation, and further developing the competencies that will allow us to solve important problems.”

PwC leaders are proud of the quality of their audits and, in particular, the progress they have continued to make, such as: 94% compliance rate of audit engagements selected for internal inspection; 99% audit professionals reported receiving consistent messages about the importance of audit quality; and 97% audit professionals reporting that they understand the practice’s objectives regarding audit quality.

The support on transparency, people strategies and new leadership framework to assess PwC professionalism were also discussed.

Please follow link for details:  http://www.pwc.com/auditquality

November 26, 2015

Accountancy Age

Has the value of audit to investors improved post-HBOS?

After the collapse of HBOS, the Bank of England’s 500-page report did not satisfactorily show how or why the failure happened. But it accordingly provided some significant points regarding the value of audit.

Excerpts from Deputy Editor Richard Crump’s Opinion:

“The ultimate arbiter of value around audit will be on how these challenges are articulated to the investment community. As is so often the case - concerns get raised about management assumptions but they never found their way through to the investment community - until a long way down the line… Improvements have been made to how audit is undertaken, so will the enhanced auditor reports complete the task? There is still some way to go for audit to deliver real value to investors.”

Please follow link for details: http://www.accountancyage.com/aa/opinion/2436695/has-the-value-of-audit-to-investors-improved-post-hbos

Audit Method: Going Concern Assessment

ISA 570 requires an auditor to obtain and evaluate management’s assessment of the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. Issues to consider by the auditor while evaluating the going concern assumption by management are as follows.

Are any events or conditions which may cast significant doubt on the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern has been identified? Examples of conditions and events can be traced from paragraphs A2 of ISA 570.

Based on our inquiries of management and our review of their assessment, were any events or conditions noted that may occur shortly beyond the management assessment that were so significant that they may cast doubt on the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern?

If audit team answer to the above two questions is “NO” then the evaluation is complete but if the answer is “YES” then the following additional audit procedures need to be undertaken.

Evaluate management’s plans for future actions in relation to its going concern assessment, whether the outcome of these plans is likely to improve the situation and whether management’s plans are feasible in the circumstances.

Stated plans: Obtain and discuss with management its plans to deal with the identified risks. Indicate the individuals interviewed.

Supporting evidence overcoming substantial doubt: Indicate below the elements of management's plans that are particularly significant to overcoming the substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. Examine and describe evidence that supports those elements. Elements include Third-party guarantee, Debt restructuring or new borrowings, Liquidation of assets, Reduction or delay of expenditures, Increase in revenues, Increase in equity etc.

Third party guarantees and other financial restructuring agreements: If there are significant guarantees of financial support from a third party (such as the entity’s parent company, another shareholder, an affiliate or a general partner of a limited partnership):

Prospective financial information: Although this information is not as persuasive as evidence provided by third parties, we usually consider it as necessary to support management's plans.

Management's representation: Obtain written representation from management and where appropriate from those charged with governance regarding management's plans and conclusion about the appropriateness of the going concern assumption and the reasonableness of related disclosures in the financial statements.

Practice

Based on the audit evidence obtained, conclude whether a material uncertainty exists relating to events or conditions, that individually or collectively, and may cast significant doubt on the entity's ability to continue as a going concern. A material uncertainty exists when the magnitude of its potential impact and likelihood of occurrence is such that, in our judgment, appropriate disclosure of the nature and implications of the uncertainty is necessary for the fair presentation of the financial statements.

Other articles on related topic:

New Regulations for Auditors: European Revolt

Audit Firm: ACCA exams

Audit firms are interested to hire and retain qualified accountants. For example, Big4 firms provide support to their employees during their study in college to obtain qualification.  ACCA (The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants) is one of the professional accounting bodies certifying accountants through exams and experience. ACCA exams test the students very rigorously and they are not easy to pass if you are not well prepared ahead of time for it. Here are few tips about approaching the ACCA exams that will prove to be helpful in your preparations and to get you pass these exams.

Familiarity with Syllabus

Get yourself familiar with the syllabus of ACCA certification. ACCA has two levels; one is the Fundamental level that includes 9 papers from F1 to F9. And the other Level is called Professional level that include a total of 7 papers from P1 to P7 but you will be given a choice to attempt any two papers among P4 to P7. Choose among the papers from P4 to P7 wisely as you may get stuck in one or two papers in the end and it can waste your exam attempts, time and money.

Learning material

Choosing your books from which to study for the exams is a very major step as it can determine your success or failure from the start. ACCA's new Approved Content Providers are:

• Becker Professional Education
• BPP Learning Media
• Kaplan Publishing

Exam Paper Analysis

After when you have finished your course well at least once you are ready to take a look at the exam papers. Analyzing exam papers for trends is very important as it can give you clues about which topics to give more weightage and which topics demand less preparation. Try to attempt the full paper in actual time bounded exam pressure simulated scenario. This will give you a very good idea of where you are lacking. Do you need to concentrate more on few topics or you need to grasp the important topics well so as to finish the paper in time.

On Exam day

Sleep well before exam day is a cliché we hear from our seniors and teachers. This is actually very important for your performance on exam day. If you will feel relax you will perform and deliver in a much better way. ACCA exams have 15 minutes reading time for reading the question paper. Use this time efficiently. Plan the first question you have to answer when the reading time is over. Also you can arrange the questions in the in the order of difficulty during that time. Attempt the easy questions first and then go for the difficult ones. When answering questions, understand the requirements of the question and write only to the point answers. Remember DO NOT leave any question unanswered of you have time remaining. There is no negative marking in these exams and writing one or two important concepts well, even if you don’t know the complete answer will secure you the minimum marks that will help you to cross the minimum passing threshold for the whole paper.

After the exam

Try avoid discussing the paper if you are going to attempt another paper in a day or two as all you have in your hands now is to get ready for the next paper and try not to repeat the mistakes which you have committed in today’s paper.

In the end I would share this beautiful quote with you.

The reason why most people face the future with apprehension instead of anticipation is because they don't have it well designed." -- Jim Rohn.

Sources:

• http://www.accaglobal.com/gb/en/discover/about.html
• http://www.accaglobal.com/ca/en/student/your-study-options/alp-content.html
• http://www.accaglobal.com/us/en/student/exam-support-resources.html

Disclaimer:
"This group is not associated with or approved by ACCA and the views expressed on this page do not necessarily reflect the views of ACCA".